Guo Qunfeng, Wang Liang, Lu Xuhua, Guo Xiang, Ni Bin
Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:675-680. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
To evaluate differences in radiologic and functional outcomes between C1-C2 posterior temporary fixation (PTF) and cephalocervicothoracic cast fixation for type III odontoid fractures.
Data from 13 patients who underwent PTF and 13 cases who underwent cephalocervicothoracic cast fixation due to fresh type III odontoid fractures were reviewed retrospectively. All patients with fracture healing underwent a functional computed tomography scan at the final follow-up to evaluate the range of motion in C1-C2 rotation. Functional outcomes were evaluated in the form of visual analog scale for neck pain, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and Neck Disability Index. The outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.
At the final follow up, all 26 patients achieved healing of their fractures. There were no complications associated with either treatment. The left-to-right ranges of motion of C1-C2 rotation were 41.9° ± 11.9° in the PTF group and 43.5° ± 12.0° in the cephalocervicothoracic cast fixation group. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the C1-C2 rotation angle (P > 0.05). There also were no significant differences between 2 groups in functional outcomes evaluated by visual analog scale for neck pain, neck stiffness, Neck Disability Index, and patient satisfaction (all P > 0.05).
The outcomes of PTF and cephalocervicothoracic cast fixation were comparable in the treatment of type III odontoid fractures. For type III odontoid fractures that cannot be managed by nonoperative fixation or anterior screw fixation, PTF may be the treatment of choice, because it spares the motion of the C1-C2 complex.
评估C1-C2后路临时固定(PTF)与头颈部胸段石膏固定治疗Ⅲ型齿状突骨折在影像学和功能预后方面的差异。
回顾性分析13例行PTF治疗和13例因新鲜Ⅲ型齿状突骨折行头颈部胸段石膏固定患者的数据。所有骨折愈合患者在末次随访时均接受功能性计算机断层扫描,以评估C1-C2旋转活动范围。以颈部疼痛视觉模拟量表、颈部僵硬程度、患者满意度和颈部功能障碍指数的形式评估功能预后。比较两组的预后情况。
在末次随访时,26例患者骨折均愈合。两种治疗方法均未出现并发症。PTF组C1-C2旋转的左右活动范围为41.9°±11.9°,头颈部胸段石膏固定组为43.5°±12.0°。两组在C1-C2旋转角度方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在通过颈部疼痛视觉模拟量表、颈部僵硬程度、颈部功能障碍指数和患者满意度评估的功能预后方面,两组之间也无显著差异(均P>0.05)。
在治疗Ⅲ型齿状突骨折方面,PTF与头颈部胸段石膏固定的预后相当。对于无法通过非手术固定或前路螺钉固定治疗的Ⅲ型齿状突骨折,PTF可能是首选治疗方法,因为它保留了C1-C2复合体的活动度。