Nouri Aria, Da Broi Michele, May Adrien, Janssen Insa, Molliqaj Granit, Davies Benjamin, Pandita Naveen, Schaller Karl, Tessitore Enrico, Kotter Mark
Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 21;13(20):6270. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206270.
Odontoid fractures (OFs) represent up to 15% of all cervical fractures encountered and present most commonly amongst elderly patients, typically in the setting of low energy trauma such as falls. The Anderson and D'Alonzo classification and Roy-Camille subtype description are the most clinically noteworthy descriptions of OFs used. Even though most patients will not present with neurological injury, mechanical instability can occur with type II and type III (Anderson and D'Alonzo) fractures, particularly if the transverse ligament of the atlas is ruptured; however, this is very rare. Conservative treatment is usually employed for type I and type III injuries, and to a varying degree for non-displaced type II injuries. Surgical treatment is typically reserved for type II fractures, patients with neurological injury, and in the setting of other associated fractures or ligamentous injury. Anterior screw fixation is a viable option in the setting of a favorable fracture line orientation in type II fractures, whereas posterior C1-C2 screw fixation is an option for any type II or type III fracture presentation. There is evidence that surgery for type II fractures has higher rates of union and lower mortality than nonoperative treatments. While surgical options have increased over the decades and the management of OF has been optimized by considering fracture subtypes and patient factors, there remains a significant morbidity and mortality associated with OFs. The aging population and changing demographics suggest that there will be an ongoing rise in the incidence of OFs. Therefore, the appropriate management of these cases will be essential for ensuring optimization of health care resources and the quality of life of affected patients.
齿突骨折(OFs)占所有颈椎骨折的15%,最常见于老年患者,通常发生在如跌倒等低能量创伤的情况下。安德森和达隆佐分类法以及罗伊 - 卡米尔亚型描述是临床上对OFs最值得注意的描述。尽管大多数患者不会出现神经损伤,但II型和III型(安德森和达隆佐分类)骨折可能会出现机械不稳定,特别是如果寰椎横韧带断裂;然而,这种情况非常罕见。I型和III型损伤通常采用保守治疗,非移位的II型损伤在不同程度上也采用保守治疗。手术治疗通常适用于II型骨折、有神经损伤的患者以及存在其他相关骨折或韧带损伤的情况。对于II型骨折中骨折线方向有利的情况,前路螺钉固定是一种可行的选择,而后路C1 - C2螺钉固定适用于任何II型或III型骨折表现。有证据表明,II型骨折的手术治疗比非手术治疗具有更高的愈合率和更低的死亡率。虽然几十年来手术选择有所增加,并且通过考虑骨折亚型和患者因素优化了OF的管理,但OFs仍存在显著的发病率和死亡率。人口老龄化和人口结构变化表明OFs的发病率将持续上升。因此,对这些病例进行适当管理对于确保优化医疗资源和提高受影响患者的生活质量至关重要。