Suppr超能文献

硅烷和硅氧烷热化学计算的计算基准

Computational benchmark for calculation of silane and siloxane thermochemistry.

作者信息

Cypryk Marek, Gostyński Bartłomiej

机构信息

Center of Molecular and Macromolecular Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sienkiewicza 112, 90-363, Łódź, Poland.

出版信息

J Mol Model. 2016 Jan;22(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00894-015-2900-1. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Abstract

Geometries of model chlorosilanes, R3SiCl, silanols, R3SiOH, and disiloxanes, (R3Si)2O, R = H, Me, as well as the thermochemistry of the reactions involving these species were modeled using 11 common density functionals in combination with five basis sets to examine the accuracy and applicability of various theoretical methods in organosilicon chemistry. As the model reactions, the proton affinities of silanols and siloxanes, hydrolysis of chlorosilanes and condensation of silanols to siloxanes were considered. As the reference values, experimental bonding parameters and reaction enthalpies were used wherever available. Where there are no experimental data, W1 and CBS-QB3 values were used instead. For the gas phase conditions, excellent agreement between theoretical CBS-QB3 and W1 and experimental thermochemical values was observed. All DFT methods also give acceptable values and the precision of various functionals used was comparable. No significant advantage of newer more advanced functionals over 'classical' B3LYP and PBEPBE ones was noted. The accuracy of the results was improved significantly when triple-zeta basis sets were used for energy calculations, instead of double-zeta ones. The accuracy of calculations for the reactions in water solution within the SCRF model was inferior compared to the gas phase. However, by careful estimation of corrections to the ΔHsolv and ΔGsolv of H(+) and HCl, reasonable values of thermodynamic quantities for the discussed reactions can be obtained.

摘要

使用11种常用密度泛函结合5种基组对模型氯硅烷(R3SiCl)、硅醇(R3SiOH)和二硅氧烷((R3Si)2O,R = H、Me)的几何结构以及涉及这些物种的反应热化学进行建模,以检验各种理论方法在有机硅化学中的准确性和适用性。作为模型反应,考虑了硅醇和硅氧烷的质子亲和能、氯硅烷的水解以及硅醇缩合生成硅氧烷的反应。作为参考值,尽可能使用实验键参数和反应焓。在没有实验数据的情况下,使用W1和CBS - QB3值代替。对于气相条件,观察到理论CBS - QB3和W1与实验热化学值之间具有极好的一致性。所有密度泛函理论(DFT)方法也给出了可接受的值,并且所使用的各种泛函的精度相当。没有注意到更新的更先进的泛函相对于“经典”的B3LYP和PBEPBE泛函有显著优势。当使用三重ζ基组而不是双ζ基组进行能量计算时,结果的准确性显著提高。与气相相比,在自洽反应场(SCRF)模型中水溶液中反应的计算准确性较差。然而,通过仔细估计对H(+)和HCl的ΔHsolv和ΔGsolv的校正,可以获得所讨论反应的热力学量的合理值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验