• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床判断中的患者变量偏差:概念概述与方法学考量

Patient variable biases in clinical judgment: conceptual overview and methodological considerations.

作者信息

López S R

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 1989 Sep;106(2):184-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.184.

DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.184
PMID:2678201
Abstract

Specific conceptual factors are presented as having contributed to the negative findings of past psychotherapy bias research. Among these factors are the restrictive nature of both the definition of bias and the model of the biased clinician. A review of published studies of several patient variable biases (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, and age) indicated that bias may best be defined in broader terms and that its occurrence may be more circumscribed than originally conceived. In addition, the lack of a theoretical perspective in this area of research is noted and the applicability of some social cognitive processes is discussed. Methodological factors are also considered, and recommendations for future research are offered.

摘要

一些特定的概念因素被认为是导致过去心理治疗偏见研究得出负面结果的原因。这些因素包括偏见定义的局限性以及有偏见的临床医生模型的局限性。对几项关于患者变量偏见(如性别、种族/民族和年龄)的已发表研究的综述表明,偏见或许最好用更宽泛的术语来定义,而且其发生范围可能比最初设想的更受限制。此外,还指出了该研究领域缺乏理论视角,并讨论了一些社会认知过程的适用性。还考虑了方法学因素,并为未来研究提供了建议。

相似文献

1
Patient variable biases in clinical judgment: conceptual overview and methodological considerations.临床判断中的患者变量偏差:概念概述与方法学考量
Psychol Bull. 1989 Sep;106(2):184-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.184.
2
On controlling for patient psychopathology in naturalistic studies of sex bias: a methodological demonstration.在自然主义性别偏见研究中控制患者精神病理学因素:一项方法学示范
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Aug;49(4):597-603. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.49.4.597.
3
Ethnic-minority lesbians and gay men: mental health and treatment issues.少数民族女同性恋者和男同性恋者:心理健康与治疗问题。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):243-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.2.243.
4
Theoretical considerations in psychotherapy with gay men and lesbians.针对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的心理治疗中的理论思考。
J Homosex. 1988;15(1-2):75-95. doi: 10.1300/J082v15n01_07.
5
Is there androcentric bias in psychiatric diagnosis?
J Med Philos. 1992 Apr;17(2):215-31. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.2.215.
6
Psychotherapy referral patterns as influenced by sex of the referring therapist and sex and age of the client.转诊治疗师的性别以及来访者的性别和年龄对心理治疗转诊模式的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;50(1):156-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.1.156.
7
Examining therapist effects in relation to clients' race-ethnicity and gender: An intersectionality approach.考察治疗师与客户的种族-民族和性别之间的关系:交叉性方法。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):122-129. doi: 10.1037/cou0000316. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Methodological note on deriving behavioral correlates for MMPI profile patterns: case of the female 4-5-6 configuration.
Psychol Rep. 1982 Jun;50(3 Pt 2):1071-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1982.50.3c.1071.
9
Clinical applications of the BEM sex-role inventory with university women.
Psychol Rep. 1981 Oct;49(2):655-66. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1981.49.2.655.
10
Psychotherapy research with ethnic minorities: empirical, ethical, and conceptual issues.针对少数族裔的心理治疗研究:实证、伦理及概念问题
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):502-10. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.502.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma, Situational Triggers, and Symptoms: How Providers Justify Borderline Personality Disorder Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.污名、情境触发因素和症状:医疗服务提供者如何为性少数和性别少数个体中的边缘型人格障碍进行辩解。
Personal Ment Health. 2025 May;19(2):e70012. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70012.
2
Does Implicit Racial Bias Affect Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonic Voices?内隐种族偏见会影响对发声障碍声音的听觉感知评估吗?
J Voice. 2023 Dec 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.11.023.
3
Review of factors resulting in systemic biases in the screening, assessment, and treatment of individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis in the United States.
美国临床高危精神病个体筛查、评估和治疗中导致系统性偏差的因素综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 13;14:1117022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1117022. eCollection 2023.
4
Bias in assessment of co-occurring mental disorder in individuals with intellectual disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice.智力障碍个体共病精神障碍评估中的偏倚:理论视角及其对临床实践的影响。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):393-414. doi: 10.1177/17446295231154119. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
5
Exploring Racial Disparities in The Brief Jail Mental Health Screen.探索简易监狱心理健康筛查中的种族差异。
Crim Justice Behav. 2012 May;39(5):635-645. doi: 10.1177/0093854811435776. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Clinician reasoning in the use of cultural formulation to resolve uncertainty in the diagnosis of psychosis.临床医生运用文化定式来解决精神病诊断中的不确定性的推理过程。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;39(1):16-42. doi: 10.1007/s11013-014-9408-5.
7
A Psychiatric Residency Curriculum About Gender and Women's Issues.精神科住院医师培训课程:性别与女性问题。
Acad Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;19(4):187-201. doi: 10.1007/BF03341545.
8
The role of sociocultural information in mental health intake sessions.社会文化信息在心理健康接诊环节中的作用。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2012;49(3):194-201.
9
Culture-sensitive functional analytic psychotherapy.文化敏感型功能分析心理治疗
Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;31(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/BF03392162.
10
Disparities in treatment for substance use disorders and co-occurring disorders for ethnic/racial minority youth.少数民族/族裔青年的物质使用障碍和共病的治疗差异。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;50(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 18.