López S R
Psychol Bull. 1989 Sep;106(2):184-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.184.
Specific conceptual factors are presented as having contributed to the negative findings of past psychotherapy bias research. Among these factors are the restrictive nature of both the definition of bias and the model of the biased clinician. A review of published studies of several patient variable biases (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, and age) indicated that bias may best be defined in broader terms and that its occurrence may be more circumscribed than originally conceived. In addition, the lack of a theoretical perspective in this area of research is noted and the applicability of some social cognitive processes is discussed. Methodological factors are also considered, and recommendations for future research are offered.
一些特定的概念因素被认为是导致过去心理治疗偏见研究得出负面结果的原因。这些因素包括偏见定义的局限性以及有偏见的临床医生模型的局限性。对几项关于患者变量偏见(如性别、种族/民族和年龄)的已发表研究的综述表明,偏见或许最好用更宽泛的术语来定义,而且其发生范围可能比最初设想的更受限制。此外,还指出了该研究领域缺乏理论视角,并讨论了一些社会认知过程的适用性。还考虑了方法学因素,并为未来研究提供了建议。