• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北卡罗来纳州小型家庭农场家禽饲养场工人的呼吸防护行为和呼吸指标:一个试点项目。

Respiratory Protection Behavior and Respiratory Indices among Poultry House Workers on Small, Family-Owned Farms in North Carolina: A Pilot Project.

作者信息

Kearney Gregory D, Gallagher Barbara, Shaw Robert

机构信息

a Department of Public Health , Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University , Greenville , North Carolina , USA.

b North Carolina Agromedicine Institute, AgriSafe Network of North Carolina, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University , Greenville , North Carolina , USA.

出版信息

J Agromedicine. 2016;21(2):136-43. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143429.

DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143429
PMID:26788985
Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate respiratory behavior and respiratory indices of poultry workers on family-owned, poultry farms with 10 or less employees in North Carolina. A field study was conducted to collect data on participants (N = 24) using spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), and an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The majority of workers (76%) ranked respiratory protection as being important, yet 48% reported never or rarely wearing respiratory protection when working in dusty conditions. A large percent of workers reported eye (55%) and nasal (50%) irritation and dry cough (50%). On average, pulmonary lung function and Feno tests were normal among nonsmokers. In bivariate analysis, significant associations were identified between working 7 days on the farm (P = .01), with eye irritation, and working 5 or fewer years in poultry farming (P = .01). Poultry workers on family-owned farms spend a considerable amount of work time in poultry houses and report acute respiratory-related health symptoms. Administrative controls among small, family-owned poultry farms are necessary to improve and promote safety and health to its employees.

摘要

这项初步研究的目的是评估北卡罗来纳州员工人数为10人或更少的家庭式家禽养殖场中家禽工人的呼吸行为和呼吸指标。开展了一项实地研究,通过肺活量测定法、呼出一氧化氮分数(Feno)以及一份由访谈员填写的问卷来收集参与者(N = 24)的数据。大多数工人(76%)认为呼吸防护很重要,但48%的工人报告称在多尘环境中工作时从未或很少佩戴呼吸防护装备。很大比例的工人报告有眼睛(55%)和鼻腔(50%)刺激以及干咳(50%)症状。非吸烟者的肺功能和Feno测试平均正常。在双变量分析中,确定了在农场工作7天(P = 0.01)与眼睛刺激之间以及从事家禽养殖5年或更少时间(P = 0.01)之间存在显著关联。家庭式农场的家禽工人在家禽舍中花费大量工作时间,并报告有与急性呼吸道相关的健康症状。小型家庭式家禽养殖场需要实施管理控制措施,以改善和促进员工的安全与健康。

相似文献

1
Respiratory Protection Behavior and Respiratory Indices among Poultry House Workers on Small, Family-Owned Farms in North Carolina: A Pilot Project.北卡罗来纳州小型家庭农场家禽饲养场工人的呼吸防护行为和呼吸指标:一个试点项目。
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(2):136-43. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143429.
2
Evaluation of respiratory symptoms and respiratory protection behavior among poultry workers in small farming operations.评估小型养殖操作中家禽工人的呼吸症状和呼吸保护行为。
J Agromedicine. 2014;19(2):162-70. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2014.886536.
3
Assessment of personal protective equipment use among farmers in eastern North Carolina: a cross-sectional study.北卡罗来纳州东部农民个人防护装备使用情况评估:一项横断面研究。
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(1):43-54. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2014.976730.
4
Respiratory issues in beef and pork production: recommendations from an expert panel.肉类生产中的呼吸问题:专家小组的建议。
J Agromedicine. 2010 Jul;15(3):216-25. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2010.486283.
5
Small nonspecialized farming as a protective factor against immediate-type occupational respiratory allergy?小型非专业化农业作为即时型职业性呼吸道过敏的保护因素?
Allergy. 2004 Dec;59(12):1294-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00560.x.
6
Impact of farm modernity on the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dairy farmers.农场现代化对奶农慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病率的影响。
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Feb;73(2):127-33. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102697. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
7
Respiratory function in poultry workers and pharmacologic characterization of poultry dust extract.家禽养殖工人的呼吸功能及家禽粉尘提取物的药理学特性
Environ Res. 1995 Jul;70(1):11-9. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1995.1040.
8
Exposure and respiratory health in farming in temperate zones--a review of the literature.温带地区农业中的暴露与呼吸健康——文献综述
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002;9(2):119-36.
9
Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers.猪和家禽养殖户的暴露评估与肺功能
Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jun;58(6):405-10. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.6.405.
10
[Farm work, dust exposure and respiratory symptoms among farmers].[农民的农业劳动、粉尘暴露与呼吸道症状]
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Oct;40(5):827-36. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102006005000006.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of inhalable endotoxin, glucan, and dust exposures in Iowa farmers.爱荷华州农民可吸入内毒素、葡聚糖和粉尘暴露的特征。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jul;228:113525. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113525. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Assessment of Respiratory Problems in Workers Associated with Intensive Poultry Facilities in Pakistan.巴基斯坦集约化家禽养殖场工人呼吸问题评估
Saf Health Work. 2020 Mar;11(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Agriculture Occupational Exposures and Factors Affecting Health Effects.
农业职业暴露及影响健康效应的因素。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Oct 5;18(12):65. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0820-8.