Suppr超能文献

成人非创伤性腹痛患者中急诊CT的相对准确性

Relative accuracy of emergency CT in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

作者信息

Perry Helen, Foley Kieran George, Witherspoon Jolene, Powell-Chandler Anna, Abdelrahman Tarig, Roberts Ashley, Lewis Wyn G

机构信息

1 Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

2 Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150416. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150416. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CT examination prior to emergency laparotomy has become ubiquitous in contemporary clinical practice, but the relative accuracy of CT in this context has not been widely reported. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and strength of agreement between the perceived pre-operative CT diagnosis and operative findings.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing pre-operative CT prior to emergency laparotomy from January 2013 to June 2014 in a large teaching hospital were analysed. The CT diagnosis was compared with operative findings using the χ(2) test and weighted kappa statistic (Kw). Results were further analysed related to the time of day the CT was reported, anatomical location and grade of the reporting radiologist.

RESULTS

361 patients [median age 67 years (18-98 years); 180 males] underwent CT prior to emergency laparotomy. CT reports were deemed accurate in 318 (88.1%) cases and inaccurate in 43 (11.9%) cases, which resulted in 5 negative laparotomies in this latter cohort (11.6%, χ(2) 37.50, df 1; p < 0.0001). Accuracy and strength of agreement varied with anatomical location of the pathology; upper gastrointestinal (UGI) 75.5%, Kw 0.673 (0.531-0.815; p < 0.001); small bowel 89.9%, Kw 0.781 (0.687-0.875, p < 0.001); lower gastrointestinal (LGI) 90.4%, Kw 0.821 (0.749-0.893; p < 0.001). CT examinations reported within normal working hours had higher strength of agreement [Kw 0.832 (0.768-0.896), p < 0.001] than CTs reported out of hours [Kw 0.789 (0.721-0.857), p < 0.001], but there was no significant difference in overall accuracy (89.9 vs 86.0%; χ(2) 1.306, df 1, p = 0.253). Reporter seniority was not associated with improved diagnostic accuracy (χ(2) 1.825, df 1; p = 0.177).

CONCLUSION

CT agreement with emergency operative pathology was good to excellent, but the strength of agreement varied in relation to anatomical location of pathology.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Overall accuracy was 88.1% with good to excellent agreement between pre-operative CT and emergency laparotomy findings in adult patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain in the acute setting. Diagnostic accuracy of CT reporting varies with anatomical location of pathology.

摘要

目的

在当代临床实践中,急诊剖腹手术前的CT检查已变得十分普遍,但CT在这种情况下的相对准确性尚未得到广泛报道。本研究的目的是确定术前CT诊断与手术结果之间的准确性和一致性强度。

方法

分析了2013年1月至2014年6月在一家大型教学医院接受急诊剖腹手术前进行术前CT检查的患者数据。使用χ²检验和加权kappa统计量(Kw)将CT诊断与手术结果进行比较。结果还根据CT报告的时间、解剖位置和报告放射科医生的级别进行了进一步分析。

结果

361例患者[中位年龄67岁(18 - 98岁);180例男性]在急诊剖腹手术前接受了CT检查。CT报告在318例(88.1%)病例中被认为是准确的,在43例(11.9%)病例中不准确,这导致后一组中有5例阴性剖腹手术(11.6%,χ² 37.50,自由度1;p < 0.0001)。准确性和一致性强度因病理的解剖位置而异;上消化道(UGI)为75.5%,Kw 0.673(0.531 - 0.815;p < 0.001);小肠为89.9%,Kw 0.781(0.687 - 0.875,p < 0.001);下消化道(LGI)为90.4%,Kw 0.821(0.749 - 0.893;p < 0.001)。在正常工作时间内报告的CT检查具有更高的一致性强度[Kw 0.832(0.768 - 0.896),p < 0.001],高于非工作时间报告的CT检查[Kw 0.789(0.721 - 0.857),p < 0.001],但总体准确性无显著差异(89.9%对86.0%;χ² 1.306,自由度1,p = 0.253)。报告医生的资历与诊断准确性的提高无关(χ² 1.825,自由度1;p = 0.177)。

结论

CT与急诊手术病理的一致性良好至优秀,但一致性强度因病理的解剖位置而异。

知识进展

在急性情况下,成年非创伤性腹痛患者术前CT与急诊剖腹手术结果之间的总体准确性为88.1%,一致性良好至优秀。CT报告的诊断准确性因病理的解剖位置而异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验