Schmitz Kathryn H, Gehlert Sarah, Patterson Ruth E, Colditz Graham A, Chavarro Jorge E, Hu Frank B, Neuhouser Marian L, Sturgeon Kathleen M, Thornquist Mark, Tobias Deirdre, Nebeling Linda C
Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;22(7):1565-71. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1214. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
When information is exchanged across disciplinary boundaries, resources are shared, and discipline-specific approaches are altered to achieve a common scientific goal, we create a new intellectual space for transdisciplinary research. This approach, fostered heavily by multiple NCI-funded initiatives, has the potential to forge new understanding of major public health issues. By breaking down disciplinary barriers, we work toward making real, meaningful, and lasting forward motion in addressing key public health issues. One of the transdisciplinary initiatives of the NCI is TREC: Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer. In this article, we review the goals and scope of TREC, as well as the ways in which the initiative promotes transdisciplinary science. A particular focus is on multiple examples of the most unique aspect of the initiative: the funding of developmental projects across multiple TREC centers, toward the goal of incubating high-risk science that has the potential to translate into major leaps forward in understanding energetics in cancer. As we enter an era of greater focus on investigator-initiated science, new approaches may be needed to ensure that the peer review process is not solely organized along disciplinary lines. Inclusion of expertise regarding transdisciplinarity, as well as representation from multiple scientific disciplines within a panel, may allow transdisciplinary research to receive an educated hearing. The body of researchers trained to work in a transdisciplinary research space is ideally suited to address these challenges.
当信息跨越学科界限进行交流、资源得以共享且特定学科的方法为实现共同的科学目标而改变时,我们就为跨学科研究创造了一个新的知识空间。这种方法在多个由美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)资助的项目中得到大力推动,有潜力促成对重大公共卫生问题的新理解。通过打破学科壁垒,我们致力于在解决关键公共卫生问题方面取得切实、有意义且持久的进展。NCI的跨学科项目之一是TREC:能量学与癌症跨学科研究。在本文中,我们回顾了TREC的目标和范围,以及该项目促进跨学科科学的方式。特别关注的是该项目最独特方面的多个例子:为多个TREC中心的发展项目提供资金,目标是培育具有高风险的科学研究,这些研究有可能在理解癌症能量学方面取得重大突破。随着我们进入一个更加注重研究者发起的科学研究的时代,可能需要新的方法来确保同行评审过程不仅仅按照学科界限来组织。纳入跨学科专业知识以及在评审小组中有多个科学学科的代表,可能会让跨学科研究得到有见识的评判。受过跨学科研究空间工作训练的研究人员群体非常适合应对这些挑战。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016-4-1
Cancer Causes Control. 2013-2-3
J Cancer Educ. 2015-12
J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014
J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014-9
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024-10-1
Front Oncol. 2023-12-12
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023-5-4
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023-5
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2022-8-1
J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014-9
Curr Nutr Rep. 2013-12-15
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013-8-28
Cancer Causes Control. 2013-2-3
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012-12-30