Vogel Amanda L, Stipelman Brooke A, Hall Kara L, Nebeling Linda, Stokols Daniel, Spruijt-Metz Donna
Clinical Research Directorate /CMRP, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick Maryland, 21702, USA.
Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, USA.
J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014;2(2).
The National Cancer Institute has been a leader in supporting transdisciplinary (TD) team science. From 2005-2010, the NCI supported Transdisciplinary Research on Energetic and Cancer I (TREC I), a center initiative fostering the TD integration of social, behavioral, and biological sciences to examine the relationships among obesity, nutrition, physical activity and cancer. In the final year of TREC I, we conducted qualitative in-depth-interviews with 31 participating investigators and trainees to learn more about their experiences with TD team science, including challenges, facilitating factors, strategies for success, and impacts. Five main challenges emerged: (1) limited published guidance for how to engage in TD team science, when TREC I was implemented; (2) conceptual and scientific challenges inherent to efforts to achieve TD integration; (3) discipline-based differences in values, terminology, methods, and work styles; (4) project management challenges involved in TD team science; and (5) traditional incentive and reward systems that do not recognize or reward TD team science. Four main facilitating factors and strategies for success emerged: (1) beneficial attitudes and beliefs about TD research and team science; (2) effective team processes; (3) brokering and bridge-building activities by individuals holding particular roles in a research center; and (4) funding initiative characteristics that support TD team science. Broad impacts of participating in TD team science in the context of TREC I included: (1) new positive attitudes about TD research and team science; (2) new boundary-crossing collaborations; (3) scientific advances related to research approaches, findings, and dissemination; (4) institutional culture change and resource creation in support of TD team science; and (5) career advancement. Funding agencies, academic institutions, and scholarly journals can help to foster TD team science through funding opportunities, institutional policies on extra-departmental and cross-school collaboration, promotion and tenure policies, and publishing opportunities for TD research.
美国国立癌症研究所一直是支持跨学科(TD)团队科学的领导者。2005年至2010年,美国国立癌症研究所资助了“能量与癌症跨学科研究I”(TREC I),这是一项中心倡议,旨在促进社会、行为和生物科学的跨学科整合,以研究肥胖、营养、身体活动与癌症之间的关系。在TREC I的最后一年,我们对31名参与研究的调查人员和学员进行了定性深入访谈,以更多地了解他们在跨学科团队科学方面的经历,包括挑战、促进因素、成功策略和影响。出现了五个主要挑战:(1)在实施TREC I时,关于如何参与跨学科团队科学的已发表指导有限;(2)实现跨学科整合的努力所固有的概念和科学挑战;(3)基于学科的价值观、术语、方法和工作方式的差异;(4)跨学科团队科学涉及的项目管理挑战;(5)不认可或奖励跨学科团队科学的传统激励和奖励系统。出现了四个主要促进因素和成功策略:(1)对跨学科研究和团队科学的有益态度和信念;(2)有效的团队流程;(3)在研究中心担任特定角色的个人进行的促成和搭建桥梁活动;(4)支持跨学科团队科学的资助倡议特征。在TREC I的背景下参与跨学科团队科学的广泛影响包括:(1)对跨学科研究和团队科学产生新的积极态度;(2)新的跨界合作;(3)与研究方法、研究结果和传播相关的科学进展;(4)机构文化变革和为支持跨学科团队科学而创造资源;(5)职业发展。资助机构、学术机构和学术期刊可以通过资助机会、关于部门外和跨校合作的机构政策、晋升和终身教职政策以及跨学科研究的出版机会来帮助促进跨学科团队科学。