Suppr超能文献

II型和III型胸腹主动脉瘤的开窗及分支型血管腔内动脉瘤修复术的疗效

Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes for type II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Eagleton Matthew J, Follansbee Matthew, Wolski Katherine, Mastracci Tara, Kuramochi Yuki

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):930-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.095. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains a challenging clinical pathology. Endovascular technology, in particular the evolution of fenestrated and branched (F/B) endografts used in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has provided a less invasive method of treating these complex aneurysms. This study evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes of F/B-EVAR for extensive type II and III TAAA.

METHODS

Data from 354 high-risk patients enrolled in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial (2004-2013) undergoing F/B-EVAR for type II and III TAAA were evaluated. Technical success, perioperative clinical outcomes, and midterm outcomes (36 months) for branch patency, reintervention, aneurysm-related death, and all-cause mortality were analyzed. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were assessed using Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

F/B-EVARs incorporating 1305 fenestration/branches were implanted with 96% of target vessels successfully stented. Completion aortography showed 2.8% patients had a type I or III endoleak. Procedure duration (6.0 ± 1.7 vs 5.5 ± 1.6 hours; P < .01) and hospital stay (13.1 ± 10.1 vs 10.2 ± 7.4 days; P < .01) were longer for type II TAAA. Perioperative mortality was greater in type II repairs (7.0% vs 3.5%; P < .001). Permanent spinal cord ischemia occurred in 4% and renal failure requiring hemodialysis occurred in 2.8% of patients. Twenty-seven branches (7.6%) required reintervention for stenosis or occlusion; and celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, and renal artery secondary patency at 36 months was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99), 98% (95% CI, 0.97-1.0), and 98% (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. Eighty endoleak repairs were performed in 67 patients, including 55 branch-related endoleaks, 4 type Ia, 5 type Ib, and 15 type II endoleaks. At 36 months, freedom from aneurysm-related death was 91% (95% CI, 0.88-0.95), and freedom from all-cause mortality was 57% (95% CI, 0.50-0.63). The treatment of type II TAAA (P < .01), age (P < .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .05) negatively affected survival.

CONCLUSIONS

F/B-EVAR is a robust treatment option for patients at increased risk for conventional repair of extensive TAAAs. Technical success and branch patency are excellent, but some patients will require reintervention for branch-related endoleak. Aneurysm extent portends a higher risk of perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality. Additional efforts are needed to improve outcomes and understand the utility of this treatment option in the general TAAA population.

摘要

目的

胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)修复仍是一项具有挑战性的临床病理学难题。血管内技术,尤其是用于血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的开窗和分支(F/B)型腔内移植物的发展,为治疗这些复杂动脉瘤提供了一种侵入性较小的方法。本研究评估了F/B-EVAR治疗广泛的II型和III型TAAA的技术和临床结果。

方法

评估了354例高危患者的数据,这些患者参加了一项由医生发起的研究性器械豁免试验(2004 - 2013年),接受F/B-EVAR治疗II型和III型TAAA。分析了技术成功率、围手术期临床结果以及中期结果(36个月),包括分支通畅情况、再次干预、动脉瘤相关死亡和全因死亡率。数据以均值±标准差表示,并使用Kaplan-Meier法、单因素分析和多因素分析进行评估。

结果

植入了包含1305个开窗/分支的F/B-EVAR,96%的目标血管成功置入支架。完成主动脉造影显示2.8%的患者存在I型或III型内漏。II型TAAA的手术时间(6.0±1.7小时对5.5±1.6小时;P <.01)和住院时间(13.1±10.1天对10.2±7.4天;P <.01)更长。II型修复的围手术期死亡率更高(7.0%对3.5%;P <.001)。4%的患者发生永久性脊髓缺血,2.8%的患者发生需要血液透析的肾衰竭。27个分支(7.6%)因狭窄或闭塞需要再次干预;36个月时腹腔干动脉(96%,95%置信区间[CI],0.93 - 0.99)、肠系膜上动脉(98%,95% CI,0.97 - 1.0)和肾动脉(9,8%,95% CI,0.96 - 1.0)的二级通畅率分别为96%、98%和98%。对67例患者进行了80次内漏修复,包括55次分支相关内漏、4次Ia型、5次Ib型和15次II型内漏。36个月时,无动脉瘤相关死亡的生存率为91%(95% CI,0.88 - 0.95),无全因死亡率为57%(95% CI,0.50 - 0.63)。II型TAAA的治疗(P <.01)、年龄(P <.01)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P <.05)对生存率有负面影响。

结论

对于广泛TAAA传统修复风险增加的患者,F/B-EVAR是一种可靠的治疗选择。技术成功率和分支通畅率良好,但一些患者将需要对分支相关内漏进行再次干预。动脉瘤范围预示着围手术期和长期发病及死亡的更高风险。需要进一步努力改善结果,并了解这种治疗选择在一般TAAA人群中的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验