Yiannakas Marios C, Mustafa Ahmed M, De Leener Benjamin, Kearney Hugh, Tur Carmen, Altmann Daniel R, De Angelis Floriana, Plantone Domenico, Ciccarelli Olga, Miller David H, Cohen-Adad Julien, Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott Claudia A M
NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Nov 10;10:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.001. eCollection 2016.
Spinal cord (SC) atrophy, i.e. a reduction in the SC cross-sectional area (CSA) over time, can be measured by means of image segmentation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, segmentation methods have been limited by factors relating to reproducibility or sensitivity to change. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a fully automated SC segmentation method (PropSeg), and compare this to a semi-automated active surface (AS) method, in healthy controls (HC) and people with multiple sclerosis (MS). MRI data from 120 people were retrospectively analysed; 26 HC, 21 with clinically isolated syndrome, 26 relapsing remitting MS, 26 primary and 21 secondary progressive MS. MRI data from 40 people returning after one year were also analysed. CSA measurements were obtained within the cervical SC. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A comparison between mean CSA changes obtained with the two methods over time was performed using multivariate structural equation regression models. Associations between CSA measures and clinical scores were investigated using linear regression models. Compared to the AS method, the reproducibility of CSA measurements obtained with PropSeg was high, both in patients and in HC, with ICC > 0.98 in all cases. There was no significant difference between PropSeg and AS in terms of detecting change over time. Furthermore, PropSeg provided measures that correlated with physical disability, similar to the AS method. PropSeg is a time-efficient and reliable segmentation method, which requires no manual intervention, and may facilitate large multi-centre neuroprotective trials in progressive MS.
脊髓(SC)萎缩,即脊髓横截面积(CSA)随时间的减小,可以通过使用磁共振成像(MRI)的图像分割方法来测量。然而,分割方法受到与可重复性或对变化的敏感性相关因素的限制。本研究的目的是评估一种全自动脊髓分割方法(PropSeg),并将其与半自动活动表面(AS)方法在健康对照者(HC)和多发性硬化症(MS)患者中进行比较。对120人的MRI数据进行了回顾性分析;26名HC,21名患有临床孤立综合征,26名复发缓解型MS,26名原发性和21名继发性进展型MS。还分析了40名一年后回访者的MRI数据。在颈髓内获得CSA测量值。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测量的可重复性。使用多变量结构方程回归模型对两种方法随时间获得的平均CSA变化进行比较。使用线性回归模型研究CSA测量值与临床评分之间的关联。与AS方法相比,PropSeg获得的CSA测量值在患者和HC中均可重复性高,所有情况下ICC均>0.98。在检测随时间的变化方面,PropSeg和AS之间没有显著差异。此外,PropSeg提供的测量值与身体残疾相关,与AS方法类似。PropSeg是一种省时且可靠的分割方法,无需人工干预,可能有助于进行进展型MS的大型多中心神经保护试验。