Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Atten Disord. 2019 Dec;23(14):1829-1837. doi: 10.1177/1087054715625299. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Clinicians frequently rely upon the results of self-report rating scales when making the diagnosis of ADHD; however, little research exists regarding the ability of self-report measures to accurately differentiate ADHD from other disorders. This present study investigated the ability of the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) to discriminate between 249 postsecondary students with carefully diagnosed ADHD and 507 clinical controls. The overall discriminant validity of the CAARS was 69%, and it had an unacceptably high false positive and false negative rate. At lower prevalence rates, a high score on the CAARS has only a 22% chance of accurately identifying individuals with ADHD. Although the CAARS is an adequate screening measure, it should not be the main method by which a diagnosis is made, as it frequently misidentifies individuals with other psychological complaints as having ADHD. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
临床医生在诊断 ADHD 时经常依赖于自我报告评分量表的结果;然而,关于自我报告测量准确地区分 ADHD 与其他疾病的能力的研究甚少。本研究调查了 Conners 成人 ADHD 评定量表(CAARS)区分 249 名经过精心诊断的 ADHD 成年患者和 507 名临床对照者的能力。CAARS 的整体判别有效性为 69%,其假阳性和假阴性率都很高。在较低的患病率下,CAARS 的高分只有 22%的机会准确识别出患有 ADHD 的个体。尽管 CAARS 是一种充分的筛查手段,但它不应该是做出诊断的主要方法,因为它经常将有其他心理问题的个体错误地识别为患有 ADHD。讨论了对临床实践的影响。