Suppr超能文献

酒精依赖患者成人注意缺陷多动障碍的筛查:自报告量表中 ADHD 症状的漏报。

Screening for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in alcohol dependent patients: Underreporting of ADHD symptoms in self-report scales.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Feuerlein Center of Translational Addiction Medicine, Germany.

Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; MEDIAN Klinik Wilhelmsheim, Oppenweiler, Germany.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Feb 1;195:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common comorbid disorder that is frequently overlooked in adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Moreover, identifying ADHD in AUD patients is time-consuming and difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of two self-report screening instruments for adult ADHD in AUD patients.

METHODS

404 adults seeking residential treatment for AUD were screened using the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Screening Self-Rating (CAARS-S-SR) and the Adult ADHD Rating Scale (ASRS). Results were compared with ADHD diagnosis obtained from a stepped approach: first, a structured interview (Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults 2.0.; DIVA) was applied; second, probable ADHD diagnoses had to be confirmed by two expert clinicians.

RESULTS

At the previously reported cut-off values, ASRS and CAARS-S-SR showed low sensitivities of 57.1 and 70.6%. A high number of false negative results (NPV ASRS: 89.5%; CAARS-S-SR: 92.3%) indicates underreporting of ADHD symptoms. Sensitivity improved at lower cut-off (ASRS ≥ 11; CAARS-S-SR ≥60) or with a combination of both instruments at lower cut-offs. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the combination of ASRS and CAARS-S-SR was superior to the AUCs of the single questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Underreporting of ADHD symptoms in ASRS and CAARS-S-SR of AUD patients requires lower cut-off values to detect the majority of ADHD, albeit at the expense of an increased rate of false-positive results. Cut-off values should be adjusted to the clinical setting. Clinicians should take into consideration that a negative screening result does not necessarily imply absence of ADHD.

摘要

背景

注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种常见的共病障碍,在患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的成年人中经常被忽视。此外,识别 AUD 患者中的 ADHD 既费时又困难。本研究旨在评估两种用于 AUD 患者成人 ADHD 的自我报告筛查工具的临床实用性。

方法

对 404 名寻求酒精使用障碍住院治疗的成年人使用康纳斯成人 ADHD 评定量表筛查自评(CAARS-S-SR)和成人 ADHD 评定量表(ASRS)进行筛查。结果与通过递进方法获得的 ADHD 诊断进行比较:首先,应用结构化访谈(成人 ADHD 诊断访谈 2.0;DIVA);其次,必须由两名专家临床医生确认可能的 ADHD 诊断。

结果

在之前报道的截断值下,ASRS 和 CAARS-S-SR 的敏感性分别为 57.1%和 70.6%,较低。大量假阴性结果(NPV ASRS:89.5%;CAARS-S-SR:92.3%)表明 ADHD 症状报告不足。敏感性在较低截断值(ASRS≥11;CAARS-S-SR≥60)或使用两个仪器的组合在较低截断值下提高。ASRS 和 CAARS-S-SR 组合的曲线下面积(AUC)优于单个问卷的 AUC。

结论

AUD 患者的 ASRS 和 CAARS-S-SR 中 ADHD 症状报告不足,需要较低的截断值来检测大多数 ADHD,但代价是假阳性结果的增加。截断值应根据临床情况进行调整。临床医生应考虑到阴性筛查结果不一定意味着不存在 ADHD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验