Carney Patricia A, Palmer Ryan T, Fuqua Miller Marissa, Thayer Erin K, Estroff Sue E, Litzelman Debra K, Biagioli Frances E, Teal Cayla R, Lambros Ann, Hatt William J, Satterfield Jason M
P.A. Carney is professor of family medicine and of public health and preventive medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. R.T. Palmer is assistant professor of family medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. M.F. Miller is senior research assistant, Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. E.K. Thayer is research assistant, Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. S.E. Estroff is professor, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. D.K. Litzelman is D. Craig Brater Professor of Medicine and senior director for research in health professions education and practice, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. F.E. Biagioli is professor of family medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. C.R. Teal is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, and director, Educational Evaluation and Research, Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. A. Lambros is active emeritus associate professor, Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. W.J. Hatt is programmer analyst, Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon. J.M. Satterfield is professor of clinical medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):730-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001090.
Behavioral and social science (BSS) competencies are needed to provide quality health care, but psychometrically validated measures to assess these competencies are difficult to find. Moreover, they have not been mapped to existing frameworks, like those from the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the quality of assessment tools used to measure BSS competencies.
The authors searched the literature published between January 2002 and March 2014 for articles reporting psychometric or other validity/reliability testing, using OVID, CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, Research and Development Resource Base, SOCIOFILE, and PsycINFO. They reviewed 5,104 potentially relevant titles and abstracts. To guide their review, they mapped BSS competencies to existing LCME and ACGME frameworks. The final included articles fell into three categories: instrument development, which were of the highest quality; educational research, which were of the second highest quality; and curriculum evaluation, which were of lower quality.
Of the 114 included articles, 33 (29%) yielded strong evidence supporting tools to assess communication skills, cultural competence, empathy/compassion, behavioral health counseling, professionalism, and teamwork. Sixty-two (54%) articles yielded moderate evidence and 19 (17%) weak evidence. Articles mapped to all LCME standards and ACGME core competencies; the most common was communication skills.
These findings serve as a valuable resource for medical educators and researchers. More rigorous measurement validation and testing and more robust study designs are needed to understand how educational strategies contribute to BSS competency development.
提供高质量医疗服务需要行为与社会科学(BSS)能力,但难以找到经过心理测量学验证的评估这些能力的方法。此外,这些能力尚未与现有的框架进行映射,比如医学教育联络委员会(LCME)和毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的框架。本系统评价旨在识别和评估用于测量BSS能力的评估工具的质量。
作者使用OVID、CINAHL、PubMed、ERIC、研究与发展资源库、SOCIOFILE和PsycINFO,检索了2002年1月至2014年3月发表的文献,以查找报告心理测量或其他效度/信度测试的文章。他们审查了5104篇可能相关的标题和摘要。为指导审查,他们将BSS能力与现有的LCME和ACGME框架进行了映射。最终纳入的文章分为三类:工具开发,质量最高;教育研究,质量次之;课程评估,质量较低。
在纳入的114篇文章中,33篇(29%)提供了有力证据支持评估沟通技能、文化能力、同理心/同情心、行为健康咨询、职业素养和团队合作的工具。62篇(54%)文章提供了中等证据,19篇(17%)提供了薄弱证据。文章映射到了所有LCME标准和ACGME核心能力;最常见的是沟通技能。
这些发现为医学教育工作者和研究人员提供了宝贵资源。需要更严格的测量验证和测试以及更稳健的研究设计,以了解教育策略如何促进BSS能力的发展。