Teutsch Carol
Med Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;87(5):1115-45. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00066-x.
Communication is an important component of patient care. Traditionally, communication in medical school curricula was incorporated informally as part of rounds and faculty feedback, but without a specific or intense focus on skills of communicating per se. The reliability and consistency of this teaching method left gaps, which are currently getting increased attention from medical schools and accreditation organizations. There is also increased interest in researching patient-doctor communication and recognizing the need to teach and measure this specific clinical skill. In 1999, the Accreditation of Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented a requirement for accreditation for residency programs that focuses on "interpersonal and communications skills that result in effective information exchange and teaming with patients, their families, and other health professionals." The National Board of Medical Examiners, Federation of State Medical Boards. and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates have proposed an examination between the. third and fourth year of medical school that "requires students to demonstrate they can gather information from patients, perform a physical examination, and communicate their findings to patients and colleagues" using standardized patients. One's efficiency and effectiveness in communication can be improved through training, but it is unlikely that any future advances will negate the need and value of compassionate and empathetic two-way communication between clinician and patient. The published literature also expresses belief in the essential role of communication. "It has long been recognized that difficulties in the effective delivery of health care can arise from problems in communication between patient and provider rather than from any failing in the technical aspects of medical care. Improvements in provider-patient communication can have beneficial effects on health outcomes". A systematic review of randomized clinical trials and analytic studies of physician-patient communication confirmed a positive influence of quality communication on health outcomes. Continuing research in this arena is important. For a successful and humanistic encounter at an office visit, one needs to be sure that the patient's key concerns have been directly and specifically solicited and addressed. To be effective, the clinician must gain an understanding of the patient's perspective on his or her illness. Patient concerns can be wide ranging, including fear of death, mutilation, disability; ominous attribution to pain symptoms; distrust of the medical profession; concern about loss of wholeness, role, status, or independence; denial of reality of medical problems; grief; fear of leaving home; and other uniquely personal issues. Patient values, cultures, and preferences need to be explored. Gender is another element that needs to be taken into consideration. Ensuring key issues are verbalized openly is fundamental to effective patient-doctor communication. The clinician should be careful not to be judgmental or scolding because this may rapidly close down communication. Sometimes the patient gains therapeutic benefit just from venting concerns in a safe environment with a caring clinician. Appropriate reassurance or pragmatic suggestions to help with problem solving and setting up a structured plan of action may be an important part of the patient care that is required. Counseling around unhealthy or risky behaviors is an important communication skill that should be part of health care visits. Understanding the psychology of behavioral change and establishing a systematic framework for such interventions, which includes the five As of patient counseling (assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange) are steps toward ensuring effective patient-doctor communication. Historically in medicine, there was a paternalistic approach to deciding what should be done for a patient: the physician knew best and the patient accepted the recommendation without question. This era is ending, being replaced with consumerism and the movement toward shared decision-making. Patients are advising each other to "educate yourself and ask questions". Patient satisfaction with their care, rests heavily on how successfully this transition is accomplished. Ready access to quality information and thoughtful patient-doctor discussions is at the fulcrum of this revolution.
沟通是患者护理的重要组成部分。传统上,医学院课程中的沟通是作为查房和教师反馈的一部分非正式地纳入的,但并没有特别或强烈地专注于沟通技能本身。这种教学方法的可靠性和一致性存在差距,目前医学院校和认证机构对此越来越关注。对医患沟通进行研究以及认识到教授和衡量这项特定临床技能的必要性的兴趣也在增加。1999年,研究生医学教育认证委员会实施了一项针对住院医师培训项目认证的要求,该要求侧重于“人际和沟通技能,以实现与患者及其家属以及其他医疗专业人员的有效信息交流和团队合作”。美国国家医学考试委员会、州医学委员会联合会以及外国医学毕业生教育委员会提议在医学院校的第三年和第四年之间进行一项考试,该考试“要求学生证明他们能够使用标准化患者从患者那里收集信息、进行体格检查,并将检查结果传达给患者和同事”。通过培训可以提高一个人在沟通方面的效率和效果,但未来的任何进展都不太可能否定临床医生与患者之间富有同情心和同理心的双向沟通的必要性和价值。已发表的文献也表达了对沟通重要作用的信念。“长期以来人们认识到,医疗保健有效提供方面的困难可能源于患者与提供者之间的沟通问题,而不是医疗保健技术方面的任何缺陷。改善医患沟通可以对健康结果产生有益影响”。对医患沟通的随机临床试验和分析研究的系统评价证实了高质量沟通对健康结果的积极影响。在这个领域持续进行研究很重要。为了在门诊就诊时实现成功且有人情味的交流,需要确保直接且具体地询问并解决患者的关键问题。为了有效,临床医生必须了解患者对其疾病的看法。患者的担忧可能多种多样,包括对死亡、毁容、残疾的恐惧;对疼痛症状的不祥归因;对医疗行业的不信任;对失去完整性、角色、地位或独立性的担忧;否认医疗问题的现实;悲伤;对离开家的恐惧;以及其他独特的个人问题。需要探索患者的价值观、文化和偏好。性别是另一个需要考虑的因素。确保关键问题得到公开表达是有效的医患沟通的基础。临床医生应小心避免评判或责骂,因为这可能会迅速导致沟通中断。有时,患者仅仅通过在安全的环境中向关心他们的临床医生倾诉担忧就能获得治疗益处。提供适当的安慰或务实的建议以帮助解决问题并制定结构化的行动计划可能是所需患者护理的重要组成部分。围绕不健康或危险行为进行咨询是一项重要的沟通技能,应成为医疗保健就诊的一部分。了解行为改变的心理学并建立此类干预的系统框架,其中包括患者咨询的五个A(评估、建议、同意、协助和安排),是确保有效医患沟通的步骤。在医学史上,存在一种家长式的方法来决定为患者做什么:医生最清楚,患者毫无疑问地接受建议。这个时代正在结束,取而代之的是消费主义和共同决策的趋势。患者相互建议“自我教育并提问”。患者对其护理的满意度在很大程度上取决于这一转变的完成情况。随时获取高质量信息以及进行深入的医患讨论是这场变革的关键。
Med Clin North Am. 2003-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28
Health Technol Assess. 2006-9
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025-7-24
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-6-2
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025-4-16
Pediatr Radiol. 2025-2
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024-9-13