Skull Base and Cerebrovascular Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):909-914. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.JNS151411. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
OBJECTIVE Reimplantation of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) to the vertebral artery (VA) is a safe and effective bypass option after deliberate PICA sacrifice during the treatment of nonsaccular and dissecting aneurysms at this location. However, the anatomy and limitations of this technique have not been studied. The goal of this study was to define the surgical anatomy and buffer lengths specific to the proximal segment of the PICA related to 2 variations of PICA reimplantation: 1) reimplantation "along-VA" (simulating a dissecting VA aneurysm), and 2) reimplantation "across-VA" (simulating a nonclippable, proximal PICA aneurysm). METHODS Ten cadaver heads (20 sides) were prepared for surgical simulation. Twenty far-lateral approaches were performed. The PICA was mobilized and reimplanted onto the VA according to 2 different paradigms: 1) transposition along the axis of the VA (along-VA) to simulate a dissecting VA, and 2) transposition perpendicular to the axis of the VA (across-VA) to simulate a nonclippable, proximal PICA aneurysm. The buffer lengths provided by mobilization of the artery in each paradigm were measured and the anatomy of perforator branching on the proximal PICAs was analyzed. RESULTS The PICA was reimplanted in all surgical simulations. The most common perforating artery on the P and P segments was the short circumflex type. No direct perforator was found on the P segment. The mean buffer length with reimplantation along the VA axis was 13.43 ± 4.61 mm, and it was 6.97 ± 4.04 mm with reimplantation across the VA. The PICA was less maneuverable when it was reimplanted across the VA, due to perforator branches of the PICA (P segment). CONCLUSIONS The buffer lengths measured in this study describe the limitations of PICA reimplantation as a revascularization procedure for nonsaccular aneurysms in this location. PICA reimplantation is a revascularization option for dissecting VA aneurysms incorporating the PICA origin that are < 13 mm in length, and for nonsaccular proximal PICA aneurysms that are < 6 mm in diameter. The final decision to reimplant the PICA depends on careful inspection of perforator anatomy that is not visible preoperatively on angiography, as well as an assessment of technical difficulty intraoperatively.
在治疗位于此处的非夹层和夹层动脉瘤时,故意牺牲后颅窝下动脉(PICA)后,将其重新植入椎动脉(VA)是一种安全有效的转流选择。然而,这项技术的解剖结构和局限性尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是定义与 PICA 再植入的 2 种变异相关的 PICA 近端节段的手术解剖结构和缓冲长度:1)“沿 VA”再植入(模拟夹层 VA 动脉瘤),2)“跨 VA”再植入(模拟不可夹闭的近端 PICA 动脉瘤)。方法:准备 10 个头骨(20 侧)进行手术模拟。进行了 20 例远外侧入路。根据 2 种不同的范例,将 PICA 游离并重新植入到 VA 上:1)沿 VA 轴的转位(沿 VA)模拟夹层 VA,2)与 VA 轴垂直的转位(跨 VA)模拟不可夹闭的近端 PICA 动脉瘤。测量每种范例中动脉游离提供的缓冲长度,并分析近端 PICA 的穿支分支的解剖结构。结果:在所有手术模拟中均重新植入 PICA。在 P 和 P 段最常见的穿支动脉是短回旋型。在 P 段未发现直接穿支。沿 VA 轴再植入时的平均缓冲长度为 13.43±4.61mm,跨 VA 再植入时为 6.97±4.04mm。当 PICA 跨 VA 再植入时,由于 PICA(P 段)的穿支分支,其可操作性降低。结论:本研究中测量的缓冲长度描述了在此位置作为非夹层动脉瘤的血运重建术的 PICA 再植入的局限性。PICA 再植入是一种血管重建选择,适用于长度<13mm 的夹层 VA 动脉瘤,以及直径<6mm 的非夹层近端 PICA 动脉瘤。是否决定再植入 PICA 取决于仔细检查术前血管造影上不可见的穿支血管解剖结构,以及术中评估技术难度。