Burger Amanda J, Lumley Mark A, Carty Jennifer N, Latsch Deborah V, Thakur Elyse R, Hyde-Nolan Maren E, Hijazi Alaa M, Schubiner Howard
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Feb;81:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
Current psychological and behavioral therapies for chronic musculoskeletal pain only modestly reduce pain, disability, and distress. These limited effects may be due to the failure of current therapies: a) to help patients learn that their pain is influenced primarily by central nervous system psychological processes; and b) to enhance awareness and expression of emotions related to psychological trauma or conflict.
We developed and conducted a preliminary, uncontrolled test of a novel psychological attribution and emotional awareness and expression therapy that involves an initial individual consultation followed by 4 group sessions. A series of 72 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain had the intervention and were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up.
Participation and satisfaction were high and attrition was low. Intent-to-treat analyses found significant improvements in hypothesized change processes: psychological attributions for pain, emotional awareness, emotional approach coping, and alexithymia. Pain, interference, depression, and distress showed large effect size improvements at post-treatment, which were maintained or even enhanced at 6 months. Approximately two-thirds of the patients improved at least 30% in pain and other outcomes, and one-third of the patients improved 70%. Changes in attribution and emotional processes predicted outcomes. Higher baseline depressive symptoms predicted greater improvements, and outcomes were comparable for patients with widespread vs. localized pain.
This novel intervention may lead to greater benefits than available psychological interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, but needs controlled testing.
目前用于慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的心理和行为疗法只能适度减轻疼痛、残疾和痛苦。这些有限的效果可能归因于当前疗法的不足:a)未能帮助患者认识到他们的疼痛主要受中枢神经系统心理过程的影响;b)未能增强与心理创伤或冲突相关的情绪的意识和表达。
我们开发并进行了一项新型心理归因及情绪意识与表达疗法的初步非对照试验,该疗法包括一次初始个体咨询,随后是4次小组会议。72例慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者接受了干预,并在基线、治疗后和6个月随访时进行了评估。
参与度和满意度较高,脱落率较低。意向性分析发现,在假设的变化过程中有显著改善:对疼痛的心理归因、情绪意识、情绪应对方式以及述情障碍。疼痛、干扰、抑郁和痛苦在治疗后显示出较大的效应量改善,在6个月时得以维持甚至增强。约三分之二的患者在疼痛和其他结局方面改善了至少30%,三分之一的患者改善了70%。归因和情绪过程的变化可预测结局。基线抑郁症状较高预示着改善更大,广泛性疼痛与局限性疼痛患者的结局相当。
这种新型干预措施可能比现有的心理干预措施给慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者带来更大益处,但需要进行对照试验。