Hill Lauren M, Maman Suzanne, Holness David, Moodley Dhayendre
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 331 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, 27599, NC, USA.
University of KwaZulu-Natal Law Clinic, Durban, South Africa.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jan 22;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0077-z.
The rights of women and people living with HIV (PLHIV) are protected under South African law, yet there is a gap in the application of these laws. While there are numerous systemic and social barriers to women's and PLHIV's exercise of their legal rights and rights to access social services, there has been little effort to document these barriers as well as legal needs and knowledge in this context.
1480 HIV-positive and HIV-negative women recruited from an antenatal clinic in Umlazi Township completed a questionnaire on legal knowledge, experience of legal issues, assistance seeking for legal issues, and barriers to seeking assistance. We compared the legal knowledge and experience of legal issues of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women, and described assistance seeking and barriers to assistance seeking among all women.
Both HIV-positive and HIV-negative women had high levels of knowledge of their legal rights. There were few important differences in legal knowledge and experience of legal issues by HIV status. The most common legal issues women experienced were difficulty obtaining employment (11 %) and identification documents (7 %). A minority of women who had ever experienced a legal issue had sought assistance for this issue (38 %), and half (50 %) of assistance sought was from informal sources such as family and friends. Women cited lack of time and government bureaucracy as the major barriers to seeking assistance.
These results indicate few differences in legal knowledge and needs between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in this context, but rather legal needs common among women of reproductive age. Legal knowledge may be a less important barrier to seeking assistance for legal issues than time, convenience, and cost. Expanding the power of customary courts to address routine legal issues, encouragement of pro bono legal assistance, and introduction of legal navigators could help to address these barriers.
南非法律保护妇女和艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)的权利,但这些法律在实施方面存在差距。虽然妇女和艾滋病毒感染者在行使其合法权利和获得社会服务权利方面存在众多系统性和社会性障碍,但在此背景下,记录这些障碍以及法律需求和知识的工作却很少。
从乌姆拉齐镇一家产前诊所招募的1480名艾滋病毒阳性和阴性妇女完成了一份关于法律知识、法律问题经历、寻求法律问题援助以及寻求援助障碍的问卷。我们比较了艾滋病毒阳性和阴性妇女的法律知识和法律问题经历,并描述了所有妇女寻求援助的情况和寻求援助的障碍。
艾滋病毒阳性和阴性妇女对其合法权利都有较高的认知水平。按艾滋病毒感染状况划分,在法律知识和法律问题经历方面几乎没有重要差异。妇女经历的最常见法律问题是就业困难(11%)和获取身份证件困难(7%)。少数曾经历法律问题的妇女为此寻求过援助(38%),所寻求的援助中有一半(50%)来自家庭和朋友等非正式渠道。妇女指出缺乏时间和政府官僚作风是寻求援助的主要障碍。
这些结果表明,在此背景下,艾滋病毒阳性和阴性妇女在法律知识和需求方面差异不大,而是育龄妇女普遍存在的法律需求。对于法律问题,法律知识可能不如时间、便利性和成本那样是寻求援助的重要障碍。扩大习惯法法院处理日常法律问题的权力、鼓励公益法律援助以及引入法律导航员有助于消除这些障碍。