Moayedoddin Babak, Markowitz John C
Private practice psychiatrist, Thônex, Switzerland.
Am J Psychother. 2015;69(4):361-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2015.69.4.361.
Grief, the psychological reaction to the loss of a significant other, varies complexly in its cause, experience, evolution, and prognosis. Although most bereaved individuals experience a normal grieving process, some develop complicated grief (CG) or major depressive disorder (MDD). The DSM-5, which controversially altered the nosology, recognizes grief-related major depression (GRMD) as a diagnostic subtype if a patient meets MDD criteria two weeks post bereavement. The (DSM-5) tries to distinguish between grief and MDD, but remains a symptom-based, centered approach to grief that is not patient centered. This article reviews grief in its normal and abnormal dimensions. Using an illustrative clinical case in which interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) was employed, we discuss the need for a more patient-centered approach to treating abnormal grief, considering the patient's personal history, perceptions, experiences of bereavement, and interpersonal environment. Clinical studies need to better identify subgroups of individuals susceptible to abnormal grief and to evaluate their response to early interventions.
悲伤,即对重要他人离世的心理反应,在其起因、体验、演变及预后方面存在复杂的差异。尽管大多数丧亲者经历的是正常的悲伤过程,但有些人会发展为复杂性悲伤(CG)或重度抑郁症(MDD)。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)对疾病分类进行了有争议的改变,若患者在丧亲两周后符合重度抑郁症标准,便将与悲伤相关的重度抑郁(GRMD)视为一种诊断亚型。DSM - 5试图区分悲伤与重度抑郁症,但仍是一种基于症状、以症状为中心而非以患者为中心的悲伤处理方法。本文回顾了悲伤的正常与异常维度。通过一个采用人际心理治疗(IPT)的典型临床案例,我们讨论了鉴于患者的个人经历、认知、丧亲体验及人际环境,需要一种更以患者为中心的方法来治疗异常悲伤。临床研究需要更好地识别易患异常悲伤的个体亚组,并评估他们对早期干预的反应。