Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:31-48. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
Laboratory tests assessing driving related skills can be useful as initial screening tools to assess potential drug induced impairment as part of a standardized behavioural assessment. Unfortunately, consensus about which laboratory tests should be included to reliably assess drug induced impairment has not yet been reached. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the sensitivity of laboratory tests to the dose dependent effects of alcohol, as a benchmark, on performance parameters. In total, 179 experimental studies were included. Results show that a cued go/no-go task and a divided attention test with primary tracking and secondary visual search were consistently sensitive to the impairing effects at medium and high blood alcohol concentrations. Driving performance assessed in a simulator was less sensitive to the effects of alcohol as compared to naturalistic, on-the-road driving. In conclusion, replicating results of several potentially useful tests and their predictive validity of actual driving impairment should deserve further research. In addition, driving simulators should be validated and compared head to head to naturalistic driving in order to increase construct validity.
实验室测试评估驾驶相关技能可以作为初步筛选工具,用于评估潜在的药物引起的损害,作为标准化行为评估的一部分。不幸的是,关于应该包含哪些实验室测试来可靠地评估药物引起的损害的共识尚未达成。本综述的目的是评估实验室测试对酒精剂量依赖性效应的敏感性,作为基准,对性能参数的影响。共纳入了 179 项实验研究。结果表明,线索 Go/No-Go 任务和具有主要跟踪和次要视觉搜索的分散注意测试在中高血液酒精浓度下对损害效应具有一致性的敏感性。与自然驾驶相比,在模拟器中评估的驾驶性能对酒精的影响不太敏感。总之,应该进一步研究几种潜在有用的测试及其对实际驾驶损害的预测有效性的复制结果。此外,为了提高结构效度,应该对驾驶模拟器进行验证,并与自然驾驶进行头对头的比较。