• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 D1+ 和 D2 淋巴结清扫术对≥pT2 或 pN+ 胃癌患者长期生存结局的影响:一项使用倾向评分匹配的大型病例对照研究。

Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeollanam-do, South Korea.

Division of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeollanam-do, South Korea; Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.013
PMID:32331983
Abstract

BACKGROUND

D2 lymph node dissection (LND) is a widely performed as a standard procedure for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there is little evidence supporting D2 over D1+ LND for gastric cancer treatment. This study compared the long-term outcomes of D2 and D1+ LND for AGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 1121 patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy and had pathologic stage of ≥ pT2 or pN+. The patients were categorized into the D1+ and D2 LND groups, and long-term survival was compared in the original and propensity score matching (PSM) cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 909 and 212 patients underwent D2 and D1+ LND, respectively. The D2 group showed more advanced stage and more frequently underwent open surgery. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the D2 group (19.5% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.034); however, mortality or ≥ grade III complications did not significantly differ between the groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not significantly differ between D2 and D1+ groups at the same stage. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the extent of LND did not significantly affect survival, after adjusting for tumor stage and other clinicopathological factors. In the PSM cohort, the D2 and D1 groups showed no significant difference in OS (p = 0.488) and DFS (p = 0.705).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival with D1+ LND was comparable to that with D2 LND for ≥ pT2 or pN + gastric carcinoma. A large randomized trial is warranted to validate the optimal extent of LND for gastric carcinoma.

摘要

背景

D2 淋巴结清扫术(LND)作为治疗进展期胃癌(AGC)的标准手术方式被广泛应用。然而,D2 较 D1+LND 对胃癌治疗更优的证据有限。本研究比较了 D2 和 D1+LND 治疗 AGC 的长期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析了 1121 例行根治性远端胃切除术且病理分期为≥pT2 或 pN+的患者资料。患者被分为 D1+和 D2 LND 两组,比较原始队列和倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列的长期生存情况。

结果

总体而言,909 例患者接受了 D2 清扫术,212 例患者接受了 D1+清扫术。D2 组分期更晚,更常采用开腹手术。D2 组术后并发症发生率显著高于 D1+组(19.5%比 13.2%,p=0.034);但两组死亡率或≥3 级并发症发生率无显著差异。在相同分期下,D2 和 D1+组的 5 年总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)无显著差异。多因素分析显示,在调整肿瘤分期和其他临床病理因素后,清扫范围对生存无显著影响。在 PSM 队列中,D2 组和 D1 组的 OS(p=0.488)和 DFS(p=0.705)无显著差异。

结论

对于≥pT2 或 pN+的胃癌,D1+LND 的长期生存与 D2 LND 相当。需要开展大型随机试验来验证胃癌最佳的 LND 范围。

相似文献

1
Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching.比较 D1+ 和 D2 淋巴结清扫术对≥pT2 或 pN+ 胃癌患者长期生存结局的影响:一项使用倾向评分匹配的大型病例对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术D1+与D2淋巴结清扫的短期疗效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 May;9(2):116-21. doi: 10.1111/ases.12269. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open extended (D2) lymph node dissection for distal gastric carcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹扩大(D2)淋巴结清扫术治疗远端胃癌的倾向评分匹配病例对照比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2792-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2809-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
4
A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.单一西方中心多位外科医生行 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的手术结局比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1422-6.
5
The Turkish experience with curative gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma: is D2 dissection worthwhile?土耳其胃癌根治性胃切除术的经验:D2 淋巴结清扫是否值得?
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jan;192(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00779-1.
6
Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与传统开腹胃癌根治术的长期预后比较,尤其在 D2 淋巴结清扫方面。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2240-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2167-x. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
7
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method.腹腔镜与开腹全胃切除术治疗胃癌的短期手术效果比较:倾向评分匹配法的病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
8
The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study.腹腔镜保留脾脏的脾门淋巴结清扫术对近端胃癌手术结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5126-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Survival benefit of D2 lympadenectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.胃腺癌患者行D2淋巴结清扫术的生存获益
Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Apr;7(3):210-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02523656.
10
Prognostic Impact of Extended Lymph Node Dissection versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection on pN0 Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.扩大淋巴结清扫术与有限淋巴结清扫术对pN0期近端进展期胃癌的预后影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jun;19(2):212-224. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e20. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy: an age and rural-urban residence-based cohort study with propensity score matching analysis.胃癌患者根治性胃切除术后总生存的差异:一项基于年龄和城乡居住地的队列研究及倾向评分匹配分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93463-x.
2
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年胃癌患者的选择性淋巴结清扫:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):7678. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247678.
3
Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions.
癌症进展中的淋巴结转移:分子机制、临床意义和治疗干预。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023 Sep 27;8(1):367. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01576-4.
4
Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.揭示淋巴结清扫术对晚期胃癌的影响:一项综合综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;13(8):1769. doi: 10.3390/life13081769.
5
Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.胃癌淋巴结清扫的现状。
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01576-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe.根据更新后的国际胰腺手术研究组标准,D1+/D2根治性胃切除术后的胰瘘:危险因素与临床后果。东欧单一外科中心高病例量外科医生的经验。
J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(1):16-29. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.