Colucci W S
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Eur Heart J. 1989 Aug;10 Suppl C:32-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/10.suppl_c.32.
Milrinone exerts potent positive inotropic and direct vasodilator properties in vitro. Several studies have been undertaken to elucidate the relative contributions of each of these actions to the overall haemodynamic effect of milrinone in patients with congestive heart failure. Intracoronary infusion of milrinone to patients with congestive heart failure results in a dose-related increase in left ventricular filling pressure, +dP/dt, indicating a positive inotropic effect due to direct myocardial stimulation. Infusion of milrinone into the brachial artery increases forearm blood flow and decreases forearm vascular resistance, indicating a direct vasodilator action in patients with congestive heart failure. The relative contribution of milrinone's positive inotropic and vasodilator actions has been assessed by two approaches. First, the haemodynamic effects of nitroprusside and milrinone were compared at doses that caused equal reductions in arterial pressure. Under this condition, the improvement in left ventricular pump function caused by milrinone exceeded that caused by nitroprusside, suggesting that a significant portion of milrinone's overall effect could not be attributed merely to vasodilatation. Second, the haemodynamic effects of intracoronary and intravenous milrinone administration were compared in the same subjects. Under these conditions, the haemodynamic effect of intracoronary drug infusion accounted for a substantial portion of the improvement in left ventricular pump function. The conclusion from these studies, taken together, is that the overall haemodynamic effect of milrinone is due to significant contributions from both its positive inotropic and its vasodilator actions. Consequently, milrinone differs significantly from pure vasodilators, such as nitroprusside, and relatively pure positive inotropic agents, such as dobutamine.
米力农在体外具有强大的正性肌力作用和直接血管舒张特性。已经开展了多项研究来阐明这些作用各自对米力农在充血性心力衰竭患者中总体血流动力学效应的相对贡献。对充血性心力衰竭患者进行冠状动脉内输注米力农会导致左心室充盈压、+dP/dt呈剂量相关增加,这表明由于直接心肌刺激产生了正性肌力作用。将米力农输注到肱动脉中会增加前臂血流量并降低前臂血管阻力,这表明在充血性心力衰竭患者中存在直接血管舒张作用。米力农的正性肌力作用和血管舒张作用的相对贡献已通过两种方法进行评估。首先,比较硝普钠和米力农在导致动脉压同等降低剂量下的血流动力学效应。在这种情况下,米力农引起的左心室泵功能改善超过了硝普钠引起的改善,这表明米力农总体效应的很大一部分不能仅仅归因于血管舒张。其次,在同一受试者中比较冠状动脉内和静脉内给予米力农的血流动力学效应。在这些条件下,冠状动脉内药物输注的血流动力学效应占左心室泵功能改善的很大一部分。综合这些研究得出的结论是,米力农的总体血流动力学效应归因于其正性肌力作用和血管舒张作用两者的显著贡献。因此,米力农与纯血管舒张剂(如硝普钠)和相对纯的正性肌力药物(如多巴酚丁胺)有显著不同。