Del Pozzi Andrew T, Miller James T, Hodges Gary J
Integrative Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, United States.
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States.
Microvasc Res. 2016 May;105:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
We examined skin blood flow (SkBF) and vasomotion in the forearm and leg using laser-Doppler fluxmetry (LDF) and spectral analysis to investigate endothelial, sympathetic, and myogenic activities in response to slow (0.1 °C·10 s(-1)) and fast (0.5 °C·10 s(-1)) local heating. At 33 °C (thermoneutral) endothelial activity was higher in the legs than the forearms (P ≤ 0.02). Fast-heating increased SkBF more than slow heating (P=0.037 forearm; P=0.002 leg). At onset of 42 °C, endothelial (P=0.043 forearm; P=0.48 leg) activity increased in both regions during the fast-heating protocol. Following prolonged heating (42 °C) endothelial activity was higher in both the forearm (P=0.002) and leg (P<0.001) following fast-heating. These results confirm regional differences in the response to local heating and suggest that the greater increase in SkBF in response to fast local heating is initially due to increased endothelial and sympathetic activity. Furthermore, with sustained local skin heating, greater vasodilatation was observed with fast heating compared to slow heating. These data indicate that this difference is due to greater endothelial activity following fast heating compared to slow heating, suggesting that the rate of skin heating may alter the mechanisms contributing to cutaneous vasodilatation.
我们使用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)和频谱分析来检测前臂和腿部的皮肤血流(SkBF)及血管舒缩运动,以研究内皮、交感神经和肌源性活动对缓慢(0.1℃·10秒⁻¹)和快速(0.5℃·10秒⁻¹)局部加热的反应。在33℃(热中性)时,腿部的内皮活性高于前臂(P≤0.02)。快速加热比缓慢加热更能增加SkBF(前臂P=0.037;腿部P=0.002)。在42℃开始时,在快速加热方案中,两个区域的内皮活性均增加(前臂P=0.043;腿部P=0.48)。长时间加热(42℃)后,快速加热后前臂(P=0.002)和腿部(P<0.001)的内皮活性均更高。这些结果证实了对局部加热反应的区域差异,并表明快速局部加热时SkBF的更大增加最初是由于内皮和交感神经活性增加。此外,持续局部皮肤加热时,与缓慢加热相比,快速加热时观察到更大的血管舒张。这些数据表明,这种差异是由于快速加热后内皮活性高于缓慢加热,这表明皮肤加热速率可能会改变导致皮肤血管舒张的机制。