Suppr超能文献

一项基于网络的鼓励步行干预措施(逐步步行计划):试点随机对照试验

A Web-Based Intervention to Encourage Walking (StepWise): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Hargreaves Elaine Anne, Mutrie Nanette, Fleming Jade Dallas

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Sport & Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 25;5(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4288.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite Internet-based interventions that incorporate pedometers with appropriate goal-setting processes and other theoretically-based behavior change strategies being proposed as a means of increasing walking behavior, few have incorporated all of these key features or assessed maintenance of behavior change.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of a 12-week pedometer step goal walking program individually tailored to baseline step counts, combined with an interactive support website for step counts, health parameters and motivation over 12 and 24 weeks.

METHODS

Low active participants (mean [SD] 46.2 [11.2] years) were randomly assigned to the Stepwise (SW) intervention group (n=49) or a comparison (CP) group (n=48). SW received a pedometer, step goal walking program and access to the SW website (containing interactive self-monitoring and goal feedback tools, motivational messages and action and coping planning strategies). CP received a pedometer and locally available physical activity information. Step counts, BMI, resting heart rate, blood pressure and glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, psychological well-being, perceived health, self-efficacy and self-determined motivation were measured at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Linear mixed model analysis found that both groups' step counts increased from baseline to week 12 (β = 11,002, CI 5739-16,266, P<.001) and 24 (β = 6810, CI 1190-12,431; P=.02). Group step counts were significantly different at week 24 with SW taking 8939 (CI 274-17604, P=.04) more steps compared to CP. Compared to baseline, both groups had improved triglyceride levels (0.14 mmol/L, CI -0.25 to -0.02, P=.02) at week 12, decreased diastolic blood pressure (4.22 mmHg, CI -6.73 to -1.72) at weeks 12 and 24 (3.17 mmHg, CI -5.55 to -0.78), improved positive (β = .21, CI 0.03-0.38, P=.02) and negative affect (β = -.15, CI -0.28 to -0.03, P=.02) at week 12, and perceived health at week 12 (β = 6.37, CI 2.10-10.65, P=.004) and 24 (β = 8.52, CI 3.98-13.06, P<.001). Total cholesterol increased at week 12 (0.26 mmol/L, CI 0.099-0.423, P=.006) and week 24 (0.38 mmol/L, CI 0.20-0.56, P<.001). Repeated measures ANOVA found motivation for walking improved from baseline with higher task self-efficacy (P<.001, η(2) = .13) and autonomous motivation (P<.001, η(2)=.14) at weeks 12 and 24 and decreased controlled motivation (P=.004, η(2)=.08) at week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups had similar improvements in step counts and physical and psychological health after 12 weeks but only the SW group successfully maintained the increased step-counts 24 weeks post-intervention. This suggests the step-goal based walking program combined with Internet-based behavior change tools were important for sustained behavior change.

摘要

背景

尽管基于互联网的干预措施将计步器与适当的目标设定过程以及其他基于理论的行为改变策略相结合,被提议作为增加步行行为的一种手段,但很少有干预措施纳入所有这些关键特征或评估行为改变的维持情况。

目的

我们研究的目的是调查一项为期12周的计步目标步行计划的效果,该计划根据基线步数进行个性化定制,并结合一个交互式支持网站,用于记录12周和24周内的步数、健康参数以及提供激励。

方法

低运动量参与者(平均[标准差]46.2[11.2]岁)被随机分配到逐步(SW)干预组(n = 49)或对照组(CP)(n = 48)。SW组收到一个计步器、计步目标步行计划,并可访问SW网站(包含交互式自我监测和目标反馈工具、激励信息以及行动和应对计划策略)。CP组收到一个计步器和当地可用的身体活动信息。在基线、12周和24周时测量步数、体重指数、静息心率、血压和血糖以及胆固醇和甘油三酯水平、心理健康、感知健康、自我效能感和自我决定动机。

结果

线性混合模型分析发现,两组的步数从基线到第12周(β = 11,002,可信区间5739 - 16,266,P <.001)和第24周(β = 6810,可信区间1190 - 12,431;P =.02)均有所增加。在第24周时,两组的步数存在显著差异,SW组比CP组多走8939步(可信区间274 - 17604,P =.04)。与基线相比,两组在第12周时甘油三酯水平均有所改善(0.14 mmol/L,可信区间 - 0.25至 - 0.02,P =.02),在第12周和第24周时舒张压降低(4.22 mmHg,可信区间 - 6.73至 - 1.72)(第24周时为3.17 mmHg,可信区间 - 5.55至 - 0.78),在第12周时积极情绪(β =.21,可信区间0.03 - 0.38,P =.02)和消极情绪(β = -.15,可信区间 - 0.28至 - 0.03,P =.02)有所改善,在第12周(β = 6.37,可信区间2.10 - 10.65,P =.004)和第24周(β = 8.52,可信区间3.98 -

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0097/4746436/d78912d70737/resprot_v5i1e14_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验