Palmonari A, Gallo A, Fustini M, Canestrari G, Masoero F, Sniffen Charles J, Formigoni A
J Anim Sci. 2016 Jan;94(1):248-54. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9649.
The role of indigestible NDF is essential in relation to OM digestibility prediction, total tract digestibility, rumen fill, passage rate, and digestion kinetics. Moreover, the truly indigestible NDF (iNDF) represents a core point in dynamic models used for diet formulations. However, despite its wide possible applications, few trials have been conducted to quantify iNDF and even fewer to investigate whether or not it is consistent among different forage sources. The objective of this study was to predict the iNDF by measuring the residual NDF after 240-h in vitro fermentation to determine the unavailable NDF (uNDF) within and among various forage types. Finally, a mathematical approach was investigated for the estimation of the uNDF fraction. In all, 688 forages were analyzed in this study. This pool included 122 alfalfa hays, 282 corn silages, and 284 grass hays. Values of uNDF varied among different forages and within the same type (22.7% ± 4.48%, 20.1% ± 4.23%, and 11.8% ± 3.5% DM for grass hay, alfalfa hay, and corn silages, respectively). The relationship among uNDF and ADL was not constant and, for grass hay and corn silage, was different ( 0.05) from the 2.4 × lignin value applied by the traditional Chandler equation. The observed uNDF:ADL ratio was 3.22 for grass hay and 3.11 for corn silage. Relationships among chemical and biological parameters and uNDF were investigated via simple and multiple regression equations. The greatest correlation with a single variable was obtained by ADL and ADF when applied to the whole data set ( = 0.63). Greater coefficients of determination resulted from a multiple regression equation for the whole data set ( = 0.80) and within each forage type ( = 0.65, 0.77, and 0.54 for grass hay, alfalfa hay, and corn silage, respectively). In conclusion, a regression approach requires specific equations and different regression coefficients for each forage type. The direct measurement of uNDF represented the best approach to obtain an accurate prediction of the iNDF and to optimize its specific purpose in dynamic nutrition models.
不可消化中性洗涤纤维(NDF)在预测有机物消化率、全肠道消化率、瘤胃充盈度、通过率和消化动力学方面起着至关重要的作用。此外,真正不可消化的NDF(iNDF)是日粮配方动态模型的核心要点。然而,尽管其应用广泛,但很少有试验对iNDF进行量化,更少试验研究其在不同饲料来源之间是否一致。本研究的目的是通过测量240小时体外发酵后的残留NDF来预测iNDF,以确定不同饲料类型内部和之间的不可利用NDF(uNDF)。最后,研究了一种数学方法来估算uNDF部分。本研究共分析了688种饲料。该样本库包括122份苜蓿干草、282份玉米青贮和284份禾本科干草。不同饲料以及同一类型饲料内部的uNDF值各不相同(禾本科干草、苜蓿干草和玉米青贮的uNDF值分别为干物质的22.7%±4.48%、20.1%±4.23%和11.8%±3.5%)。uNDF与酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)之间的关系并不恒定,对于禾本科干草和玉米青贮,该关系与传统钱德勒方程应用的2.4×木质素值不同(P<0.05)。观察到的禾本科干草uNDF:ADL比值为3.22,玉米青贮为3.11。通过简单和多元回归方程研究了化学和生物学参数与uNDF之间的关系。将ADL和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)应用于整个数据集时,与单个变量的相关性最高(R² = 0.63)。整个数据集的多元回归方程(R² = 0.80)以及每种饲料类型内部(禾本科干草、苜蓿干草和玉米青贮的R²分别为0.65、0.77和0.54)的决定系数更高。总之,回归方法需要针对每种饲料类型使用特定方程和不同的回归系数。直接测量uNDF是准确预测iNDF并在动态营养模型中优化其特定用途的最佳方法。