Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍与单相抑郁症患者的社会心理人口统计学及临床特征对比研究

A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression.

作者信息

Nisha A, Sathesh V, Punnoose Varghese P, Varghese P Joseph

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, MOSC Medical College, Kolenchery, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

Department of Psychiatry, T D Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct-Dec;57(4):392-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.171842.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have revealed significant differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar depression (UP). Misdiagnosing BP depression results in suboptimal symptom resolution, induction of manic switch, mixed state, or accelerated cycling. This study compares various psycho-socio-demographic, longitudinal course, and phenomenological factors associated with BP and UP depression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared 30 UP and 30 BP depression patients using a specially designed intake proforma, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic criteria for research, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-21 (HAMD-21), Hypomania Checklist-32 Questionnaire (HCL-32), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), and Kuppuswami's socioeconomic status scale.

RESULTS

BP depression group consisted of mostly males, with earlier age of onset of illness, longer illness duration, frequent episodes, hospitalizations and psychotic symptoms. The total HAM-D score and 4 HAM-D item scores-psychomotor retardation, insight, diurnal variation of symptoms and its severity, and paranoid symptoms were significantly higher in this group. Binary logistic regression identified the age of onset, the total duration of illness, frequency of affective episodes, and presence of delusions as predictors of bipolarity (odds ratio = 1.327; 1.517; 0.062; 0.137).

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of clinical markers of bipolarity from large scale prospective studies is needed.

摘要

背景

多项研究揭示了双相情感障碍(BP)和单相抑郁症(UP)之间的显著差异。将BP抑郁症误诊会导致症状缓解不理想、诱发躁狂发作、出现混合状态或加速循环发作。本研究比较了与BP和UP抑郁症相关的各种心理社会人口统计学、纵向病程和现象学因素。

材料与方法

我们使用专门设计的接诊表格、国际疾病分类第10版研究用诊断标准、汉密尔顿抑郁量表21项版(HAMD - 21)、轻躁狂检查表32项问卷(HCL - 32)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和库普苏瓦米社会经济地位量表,对30例UP抑郁症患者和30例BP抑郁症患者进行了比较。

结果

BP抑郁症组男性居多,发病年龄较早,病程较长,发作频繁,住院次数多且有精神病性症状。该组的HAM - D总分以及4项HAM - D项目得分——精神运动迟缓、自知力、症状及其严重程度的昼夜变化以及偏执症状均显著更高。二元逻辑回归分析确定发病年龄、疾病总病程、情感发作频率和妄想的存在为双相情感障碍的预测因素(比值比分别为1.327;1.517;0.062;0.137)。

结论

需要通过大规模前瞻性研究来确定双相情感障碍的临床标志物。

相似文献

2
ECNP consensus meeting. Bipolar depression. Nice, March 2007.欧洲神经精神药理学会共识会议。双相抑郁症。英国尼斯,2007年3月。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;18(7):535-49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 23.
5
Classifying mood disorders by age-at-onset instead of polarity.根据发病年龄而非极性对情绪障碍进行分类。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 1;33(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

6
Mood Disorders in Family Practice: Beyond Unipolarity to Bipolarity.家庭医疗中的情绪障碍:从单相到双相
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;4(4):142-150. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v04n0405.
7
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验