Nisha A, Sathesh V, Punnoose Varghese P, Varghese P Joseph
Department of Psychiatry, MOSC Medical College, Kolenchery, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Department of Psychiatry, T D Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct-Dec;57(4):392-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.171842.
Several studies have revealed significant differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar depression (UP). Misdiagnosing BP depression results in suboptimal symptom resolution, induction of manic switch, mixed state, or accelerated cycling. This study compares various psycho-socio-demographic, longitudinal course, and phenomenological factors associated with BP and UP depression.
We compared 30 UP and 30 BP depression patients using a specially designed intake proforma, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic criteria for research, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-21 (HAMD-21), Hypomania Checklist-32 Questionnaire (HCL-32), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), and Kuppuswami's socioeconomic status scale.
BP depression group consisted of mostly males, with earlier age of onset of illness, longer illness duration, frequent episodes, hospitalizations and psychotic symptoms. The total HAM-D score and 4 HAM-D item scores-psychomotor retardation, insight, diurnal variation of symptoms and its severity, and paranoid symptoms were significantly higher in this group. Binary logistic regression identified the age of onset, the total duration of illness, frequency of affective episodes, and presence of delusions as predictors of bipolarity (odds ratio = 1.327; 1.517; 0.062; 0.137).
Identification of clinical markers of bipolarity from large scale prospective studies is needed.
多项研究揭示了双相情感障碍(BP)和单相抑郁症(UP)之间的显著差异。将BP抑郁症误诊会导致症状缓解不理想、诱发躁狂发作、出现混合状态或加速循环发作。本研究比较了与BP和UP抑郁症相关的各种心理社会人口统计学、纵向病程和现象学因素。
我们使用专门设计的接诊表格、国际疾病分类第10版研究用诊断标准、汉密尔顿抑郁量表21项版(HAMD - 21)、轻躁狂检查表32项问卷(HCL - 32)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和库普苏瓦米社会经济地位量表,对30例UP抑郁症患者和30例BP抑郁症患者进行了比较。
BP抑郁症组男性居多,发病年龄较早,病程较长,发作频繁,住院次数多且有精神病性症状。该组的HAM - D总分以及4项HAM - D项目得分——精神运动迟缓、自知力、症状及其严重程度的昼夜变化以及偏执症状均显著更高。二元逻辑回归分析确定发病年龄、疾病总病程、情感发作频率和妄想的存在为双相情感障碍的预测因素(比值比分别为1.327;1.517;0.062;0.137)。
需要通过大规模前瞻性研究来确定双相情感障碍的临床标志物。