Sumana B S, Muniyappa Bharathi
Professor, Department of Pathology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre , Bengaluru, India .
Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute , Mysore, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):EC08-12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/16490.6869. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Ultrasonography guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is currently the most favoured and increasingly used pre-operative diagnostic procedure in various deep seated neoplastic and non-neoplastic mass lesions. Cell blocks prepared from residual fine needle aspiration (FNA) material can aid in better morphologic assessment and contribute to establish a more definitive cytopathologic diagnosis.
To assess the value of ultrasonography guided FNAC in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal (non-pelvic) masses.
To determine the reliability of ultrasonography guided FNAC in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic intra-abdominal mass lesions. To assess the usefulness of cell block as a complimentary diagnostic material in the morphologic evaluation of the lesions.
Aspirate material was collected from 62 patients with clinically and/or radiologically detected abdominal mass under ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. Pelvic masses were excluded from the study. In every case an attempt was made to prepare cell block (CB) from any residual material after preparation of routine smears. The final cytomorphologic diagnosis was correlated with clinical and radiologic findings, histopathologic diagnosis, follow up and response to therapy information.
The diagnostic yield of USG guided FNAC was 96.77%. The cases included 42 malignant (67.74%), two (3.23%) benign, and 16 (25.8%) non-neoplastic lesions. Two (3.23%) smears were unsatisfactory for evaluation. In 45 out of 62 cases (72.58%) CB preparations were available. There was a good agreement between smear diagnosis and that observed on CB section. Additionally CB yielded better diagnostic material in 15.55% of cases and aided in establishing a more precise final cytopathologic diagnosis. Confirmation of diagnosis in the form of biopsy and/or surgically resected specimen and follow up was available in 56 cases. The overall diagnostic accuracy of USG guided FNAC was 96.43% with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 95.35%, 100%, 100% and 86.66% respectively.
USG guided FNA procedure provides a good diagnostic yield for intra-abdominal masses. Also it has high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Cell block preparations facilitate better diagnosis of lesions when reviewed along with cytological smears.
超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸细胞学检查(FNAC)是目前在各种深部肿瘤性和非肿瘤性肿块病变中最受青睐且使用越来越多的术前诊断方法。由残留细针穿刺(FNA)材料制备的细胞块有助于更好地进行形态学评估,并有助于建立更明确的细胞病理学诊断。
评估超声引导下FNAC在诊断腹腔内(非盆腔)肿块中的价值。
确定超声引导下FNAC在区分腹腔内肿瘤性与非肿瘤性肿块病变方面的可靠性。评估细胞块作为病变形态学评估中补充诊断材料的有用性。
在超声(USG)引导下,从62例临床和/或放射学检查发现有腹部肿块的患者中采集抽吸材料。盆腔肿块被排除在本研究之外。在每例病例中,在制备常规涂片后,尝试从任何残留材料制备细胞块(CB)。最终的细胞形态学诊断与临床和放射学检查结果、组织病理学诊断、随访及治疗反应信息进行对照。
超声引导下FNAC的诊断阳性率为96.77%。病例包括42例恶性(67.74%)、2例良性(3.23%)和16例非肿瘤性病变(25.8%)。2例(3.23%)涂片评估不满意。62例中有45例(72.58%)可获得CB标本。涂片诊断与CB切片观察结果之间有良好的一致性。此外,CB在15.55%的病例中产生了更好的诊断材料,并有助于建立更精确的最终细胞病理学诊断。56例病例有活检和/或手术切除标本形式的诊断确认及随访资料。超声引导下FNAC的总体诊断准确率为96.43%,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95.35%、100%、100%和86.66%。
超声引导下FNA检查对腹腔内肿块有良好的诊断阳性率。在区分良性与恶性病变方面也具有高敏感性和特异性。细胞块标本与细胞学涂片一起检查时有助于更好地诊断病变。