Wee Aileen
Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Republic of Singapore.
Cytojournal. 2005 Jun 8;2:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-2-7.
The role of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the evaluation of focal liver lesions has evolved. Guided FNAB is still useful to procure a tissue diagnosis if clinical, biochemical and radiologic findings are inconclusive. Major diagnostic issues include: (i) Distinction of benign hepatocellular nodular lesions from reactive hepatocytes, (ii) Distinction of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WD-HCC) from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions, (iii) Distinction of poorly differentiated HCC from cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic carcinomas, (iv) Determination of histogenesis of malignant tumor, and (v) Determination of primary site of origin of malignant tumor. This review gives a general overview of hepatic FNAB; outlines an algorithmic approach to cytodiagnosis with emphasis on HCC, its variants and their mimics; and addresses current diagnostic issues. Close radiologic surveillance of high-risk cirrhotic patients has resulted in the increasing detection of smaller lesions with many subjected to biopsy for tissue characterization. The need for tissue confirmation in clinically obvious HCC is questioned due to risk of malignant seeding. When a biopsy is indicated, core needle biopsy is favored over FNAB. The inherent difficulty of distinguishing small/early HCC from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions has resulted in indeterminate reports. Changing concepts in the understanding of the biological behavior and morphologic evolution of HCC and its precursors; and the current lack of agreement on the morphologic criteria for distinguishing high-grade dysplastic lesions (with small cell change) from WD-HCC, have profound impact on nomenclature, cytohistologic interpretation and management. Optimization of hepatic FNAB to enhance the yield and accuracy of diagnoses requires close clinicopathologic correlation; combined cytohistologic approach; judicious use of ancillary tests; and skilled healthcare teams.
细针穿刺活检(FNAB)在局灶性肝病变评估中的作用已经发生了演变。如果临床、生化和影像学检查结果不明确,超声引导下的FNAB对于获取组织诊断仍很有用。主要的诊断问题包括:(i)将良性肝细胞结节性病变与反应性肝细胞区分开来;(ii)将高分化肝细胞癌(WD-HCC)与良性肝细胞结节性病变区分开来;(iii)将低分化HCC与胆管癌和转移癌区分开来;(iv)确定恶性肿瘤的组织发生;以及(v)确定恶性肿瘤的原发部位。本文综述对肝脏FNAB进行了概述;概述了一种细胞诊断的算法方法,重点是HCC及其变体和相似病变;并讨论了当前的诊断问题。对高危肝硬化患者进行密切的影像学监测,导致越来越多较小病变被检测出来,其中许多需要进行活检以进行组织特征分析。由于存在恶性种植的风险,临床上明显的HCC是否需要组织学确诊受到质疑。当需要进行活检时,粗针活检比FNAB更受青睐。将小/早期HCC与良性肝细胞结节性病变区分开来存在固有的困难,这导致了不确定的报告。对HCC及其前体的生物学行为和形态演变的理解不断变化;以及目前在区分高级别发育异常病变(伴有小细胞改变)与WD-HCC的形态学标准上缺乏共识,对命名、细胞组织学解释和管理产生了深远影响。优化肝脏FNAB以提高诊断的产量和准确性需要密切的临床病理相关性;联合细胞组织学方法;明智地使用辅助检查;以及专业的医疗团队。