• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖性切除而非手术切缘宽度影响肝癌切除术后的生存:一项倾向评分分析

Anatomical Resection But Not Surgical Margin Width Influence Survival Following Resection for HCC, A Propensity Score Analysis.

作者信息

Lee Jung-Woo, Lee Young-Joo, Park Kwang-Min, Hwang Dae-Wook, Lee Jae Hoon, Song Ki Byung

机构信息

Hallym University College of Medicine, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Ku, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3421-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-016-3421-5
PMID:26817652
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effects of the surgical resection margin on the clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases remain controversial. The objective of this study was to further examine this issue.

METHODS

The details of all HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy between December 1999 and December 2009 at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Asan Medical Center were analyzed retrospectively. We divided 1022 HCC patients into two groups according to the most significant surgical margin length. To overcome any bias due to differences in the distribution of covariates between the two groups, the patients were in a matched 1:1 ratio by propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

A surgical margin ≤1 mm was identified as the most significant surgical margin in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.026, respectively). However, many clinicopathological factors were different between the resection margin ≤1 mm and >1 mm groups. To reduce these different clinicopathological factors, propensity score matching was performed using 21 selected factors. After matching, no significant difference was found in DFS and OS between the two groups (p = 0.688, p = 0.398). In addition, there was no significant difference in the intrahepatic recurrence rate and pattern between the resection margin groups. Except for the preoperative patient's status and tumor stage, significant risk factors in OS were anatomical resection and postoperative morbidity (p = 0.002, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified that the widths of the resection margin in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma did not influence the postoperative recurrence rates, overall survival, and recurrence pattern in multivariable analysis as well as propensity score match analysis.

摘要

背景

手术切缘对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者临床结局的影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是进一步探讨这一问题。

方法

回顾性分析1999年12月至2009年12月在峨山医学中心肝胆胰外科接受肝切除术的所有HCC患者的详细资料。根据最显著的手术切缘长度,将1022例HCC患者分为两组。为克服两组间协变量分布差异导致的任何偏差,通过倾向评分分析将患者按1:1比例进行匹配。

结果

在无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)方面,手术切缘≤1 mm均被确定为最显著的手术切缘(分别为p = 0.008和p = 0.026)。然而,切缘≤1 mm组和>1 mm组之间存在许多临床病理因素差异。为减少这些不同的临床病理因素,使用21个选定因素进行倾向评分匹配。匹配后,两组间的DFS和OS无显著差异(p = 0.688,p = 0.398)。此外,切缘组之间的肝内复发率和复发模式无显著差异。除术前患者状态和肿瘤分期外,OS的显著危险因素为解剖性切除和术后发病率(p = 0.002,p = 0.001)。

结论

我们发现,在多变量分析以及倾向评分匹配分析中,可切除肝细胞癌的手术切缘宽度不影响术后复发率、总生存期和复发模式。

相似文献

1
Anatomical Resection But Not Surgical Margin Width Influence Survival Following Resection for HCC, A Propensity Score Analysis.解剖性切除而非手术切缘宽度影响肝癌切除术后的生存:一项倾向评分分析
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3421-5.
2
Anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion: A propensity score matching analysis.无肉眼可见血管侵犯的孤立性肝细胞癌的解剖性切除与非解剖性切除:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;32(4):870-878. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13603.
3
[Surgical treatment of primary liver cancer:a report of 10 966 cases].[原发性肝癌的外科治疗:10966例报告]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 1;59(1):6-17. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20201110-00791.
4
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
5
Anatomic resection and wide resection margin play an important role in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with peritumoural micrometastasis.解剖性切除及宽切缘在伴有肿瘤周围微转移的肝细胞癌肝切除术中起着重要作用。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):E482-E486. doi: 10.1111/ans.15396. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jun;102(7):776-84. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9815. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
Long-term oncologic results of anatomic vs. parenchyma-sparing resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. A propensity score-matching analysis.解剖性与保肝功能肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;44(10):1580-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Anatomic versus nonanatomic hepatectomy for a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma : a case-controlled study with propensity score matching.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗孤立性肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1994-2002. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2646-6. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
9
Impact of marginal resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.边缘切除术治疗肝细胞癌的影响。
Surg Today. 2020 Nov;50(11):1471-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02029-z. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Surgical Margin Affects the Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Radical Hepatectomy Followed by Adjuvant TACE.手术切缘影响根治性肝切除术后辅助 TACE 治疗的肝细胞癌患者的长期预后。
Oncologist. 2023 Aug 3;28(8):e633-e644. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad088.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrence Patterns After Hepatectomy With Very Narrow Resection Margins for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌肝切除术后切缘极窄时的复发模式
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 12;9:926728. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.926728. eCollection 2022.
2
Toxicity Profiles of Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.晚期肝细胞癌系统治疗的毒性特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222721. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22721.
3
Could Photodynamic Therapy Be a Promising Therapeutic Modality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients? A Critical Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
In hepatocellular carcinomas, any proportion of poorly differentiated components is associated with poor prognosis after hepatectomy.在肝细胞癌中,任何比例的低分化成分都与肝切除术后的不良预后相关。
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2374-1.
2
Minimum resection margin should be based on tumor size in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatoviral infection patients.在病毒性肝炎患者行肝切除治疗肝细胞肝癌时,最小切缘应基于肿瘤大小。
Hepatol Res. 2013 Dec;43(12):1295-303. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12079. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
Is less than 5 mm as the narrowest surgical margin width in central resections of hepatocellular carcinoma justified?
光动力疗法能否成为肝细胞癌患者一种有前景的治疗方式?对实验和临床研究的批判性综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;13(20):5176. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205176.
4
Ideal Surgical Margin to Prevent Early Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝切除治疗肝细胞癌以预防早期复发的理想手术切缘。
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):1159-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05881-9. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.肝细胞癌射频消融的安全 margins:一项使用超顺磁性氧化铁磁共振成像的前瞻性研究。 注:原文中的“Safety margin”直译为“安全边际”,结合医学语境这里可理解为“安全范围”等意思,译文采用了更符合医学表达习惯的“安全 margins”(可能是“安全界限”等类似表述,具体准确含义需结合完整医学知识确定) 。
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Jul;37(7):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00843-1. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
Preoperative survival calculator for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.可切除肝细胞癌的术前生存计算器
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Apr;9(2):316-325. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.12.03.
7
Prognostic impact of surgical margin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.手术切缘对肝细胞癌患者的预后影响:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8043. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008043.
肝癌中央切除术的手术切缘最小宽度是否应小于 5mm?
Am J Surg. 2013 Jul;206(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.06.010. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
4
Is wider surgical margin justified for better clinical outcomes in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma?对于可切除的肝细胞癌患者,更宽的手术切缘是否能带来更好的临床结局?
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Mar;111(3):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
5
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience.小肝癌患者行肝段切除术或肝叶切除术:20 年经验回顾
Surgery. 2010 May;147(5):676-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.043. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
7
[Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009].《2009年肝细胞癌管理实践指南》
Korean J Hepatol. 2009 Sep;15(3):391-423. doi: 10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.3.391.
8
Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.手术失血可独立预测肝细胞癌切除术后的复发和生存情况。
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):617-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed22f.
9
Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations.一些倾向得分匹配方法的性能优于其他方法:实证研究与蒙特卡罗模拟结果
Biom J. 2009 Feb;51(1):171-84. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810488.
10
Risk factors and outcome of early recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinomas.小肝细胞癌切除术后早期复发的危险因素及结局
Am J Surg. 2009 Jul;198(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.051. Epub 2009 Jan 29.