Cuspidi Cesare, Sala Carla, Tadic Marijana, Gherbesi Elisa, Grassi Guido, Mancia Giuseppe
aDepartment of Health Science, University of Milano-Bicocca bIstituto Auxologico Italiano cDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano dFondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milano eUniversity Clinical Hospital Centre 'Dragisa Misovic', Belgrade, Serbia fIstituto di Ricerche a Carattere Scientifico Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
J Hypertens. 2016 Mar;34(3):385-91; discussion 391-2. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000812.
Evidence on the association of nondipping pattern with carotid atherosclerosis is scarce. We performed a meta-analysis in order to provide comprehensive information on subclinical carotid alterations in nondipping as compared with dipping individuals. A computerized search was performed using PubMed, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases from 1 January 1990 up to 31 March 2015. Full articles providing data on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque in nondipping and dipping individuals, as assessed by ultrasonography, were analyzed. A total of 2753 adult individuals (1003 nondipping and 1750 dipping) included in 13 studies were considered. Common carotid IMT was higher in nondipping than in dipping individuals [807 ± 36 μm vs. 746 ± 28 μm, standard means difference, SMD: 0.37 ± 0.09, confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.56, P < 0.01]. From data on plaque prevalence provided by five studies, the odds ratio for carotid plaques resulted 67% higher in nondipping (95% CI: 1.26-2.21, P < 0.01) than in dipping individuals. Our findings support an association between nondipping pattern and increased risk of subclinical carotid alterations. In a practical perspective, the present meta-analysis reinforces the view that an effective blood pressure control over the entire 24-h period, in particular at night, may prevent the progression of vascular damage associated with nondipping phenotype.
关于非勺型血压模式与颈动脉粥样硬化之间关联的证据很少。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以便提供与勺型血压者相比,非勺型血压者亚临床颈动脉改变的全面信息。使用PubMed、OVID、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,对1990年1月1日至2015年3月31日期间的文献进行了计算机检索。分析了通过超声评估的关于非勺型血压者和勺型血压者颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)和斑块的数据的完整文章。共纳入了13项研究中的2753名成年人(1003名非勺型血压者和1750名勺型血压者)。非勺型血压者的颈总动脉IMT高于勺型血压者[807±36μm对746±28μm,标准均数差,SMD:0.37±0.09,置信区间(CI):0.19 - 0.56,P<0.01]。根据五项研究提供的斑块患病率数据,非勺型血压者颈动脉斑块的优势比比勺型血压者高67%(95%CI:1.26 - 2.21,P<0.01)。我们的研究结果支持非勺型血压模式与亚临床颈动脉改变风险增加之间存在关联。从实际角度来看,本荟萃分析强化了这样一种观点,即24小时全天尤其是夜间有效的血压控制可能会预防与非勺型血压表型相关的血管损伤进展。