Chen Hsiang Ling, Koprowski John L
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0148121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148121. eCollection 2016.
Anthropogenic infrastructure such as roads and non-native species are major causes of species endangerment. Understanding animal behavioral responses to roads and traffic provides insight into causes and mechanisms of effects of linear development on wildlife and aids effective mitigation and conservation. We investigated effects of roads and traffic on space use and movements of two forest-dwelling species: endemic, forest-dependent Mount Graham red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis) and introduced, edge-tolerant Abert's squirrels (Sciurus aberti). To assess the effects of roads on space use and movement patterns, we compared the probability that a squirrel home range included roads and random lines in forests, and assessed effects of traffic intensity on rate of road crossing and movement patterns. Red squirrels avoided areas adjacent to roads and rarely crossed roads. In contrast, Abert's squirrels were more likely to include roads in their home ranges compared to random lines in forests. Both red squirrels and Abert's squirrels increased speed when crossing roads, compared to before and after road crossings. Increased hourly traffic volume reduced the rate of road crossings by both species. Behavioral responses of red squirrels to roads and traffic resemble responses to elevated predation risk, including reduced speed near roads and increased tortuosity of movement paths with increased traffic volume. In contrast, Abert's squirrels appeared little affected by roads and traffic with tortuosity of movement paths reduced as distance to roads decreased. We found that species with similar body size category (<1 kg) but different habitat preference and foraging strategy responded to roads differently and demonstrated that behavior and ecology are important when considering effects of roads on wildlife. Our results indicate that roads restricted movements and space use of a native forest-dependent species while creating habitat preferred by an introduced, edge-tolerant species.
道路等人为基础设施和非本地物种是物种濒危的主要原因。了解动物对道路和交通的行为反应,有助于深入了解线性开发对野生动物的影响及其作用机制,并有助于采取有效的缓解和保护措施。我们研究了道路和交通对两种栖息于森林的物种空间利用和移动的影响:地方性、依赖森林的格雷厄姆山红松鼠(Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis)和引入的、适应边缘环境的阿伯特松鼠(Sciurus aberti)。为了评估道路对空间利用和移动模式的影响,我们比较了松鼠家域包含道路和森林中随机线路的概率,并评估了交通强度对过马路速率和移动模式的影响。红松鼠避开道路附近区域,很少过马路。相比之下,与森林中的随机线路相比,阿伯特松鼠的家域更有可能包含道路。与过马路之前和之后相比,红松鼠和阿伯特松鼠在过马路时速度都有所提高。每小时交通流量的增加降低了两个物种的过马路速率。红松鼠对道路和交通的行为反应类似于对捕食风险增加的反应,包括在道路附近速度降低以及随着交通流量增加移动路径的曲折度增加。相比之下,阿伯特松鼠似乎受道路和交通的影响很小,随着与道路距离的减小,其移动路径的曲折度降低。我们发现,体型相似(<1千克)但栖息地偏好和觅食策略不同的物种对道路的反应不同,并表明在考虑道路对野生动物的影响时,行为和生态很重要。我们的结果表明,道路限制了一种依赖本地森林的物种的移动和空间利用,同时创造了一种引入的、适应边缘环境的物种所偏好的栖息地。