Medical Affairs and Clinical Research, Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai, India.
Department of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Health Medical Center, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Cardiology University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 2;67(4):379-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.083.
Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretic agents are being increasingly used at lower doses. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in the 12.5-mg dose remains the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agent in the United States.
This study compared chlorthalidone, 6.25 mg daily, with HCTZ, 12.5 mg daily, by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring and evaluated efficacy. Because HCTZ has been perceived as a short-acting drug, a third comparison with an extended-release formulation (HCTZ-controlled release [CR]) was added.
This 12-week comparative, double-blind, outpatient study randomized 54 patients with stage 1 hypertension to receive either chlorthalidone, 6.25 mg, (n = 16); HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 18); or HCTZ-CR 12.5 mg (n = 20). ABP monitoring was performed at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy.
All 3 treatments significantly (p < 0.01) lowered office BP at weeks 4 and 12 from baseline. At weeks 4 and 12, significant reductions in systolic and diastolic 24-h ambulatory and nighttime BP (p < 0.01) were observed with chlorthalidone but not with HCTZ. At weeks 4 (p = 0.015) and 12 (p = 0.020), nighttime systolic ABP was significantly lower in the chlorthalidone group than in the the HCTZ group. With HCTZ therapy, sustained hypertension was converted into masked hypertension. In contrast to the HCTZ group, the HCTZ-CR group also showed a significant (p < 0.01) reduction in 24-h ABP. All 3 treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.
Treatment with low-dose chlorthalidone, 6.25 mg daily, significantly reduced mean 24-h ABP as well as daytime and nighttime BP. Due to its short duration of action, no significant 24-h ABP reduction was seen with HCTZ, 12.5 mg daily, which merely converted sustained hypertension into masked hypertension. Thus, low-dose chlorthalidone, 6.25 mg, could be used as monotherapy for treatment of essential hypertension, whereas low-dose HCTZ monotherapy is not an appropriate antihypertensive drug. (Comparative Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Hydrochlorothiazide CR with Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Stage I Essential Hypertension; CTRI/2013/07/003793).
噻嗪类和噻嗪样利尿剂在较低剂量下的应用越来越广泛。在美国,氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的 12.5mg 剂量仍然是最常用的降压药物。
本研究通过 24 小时动态血压监测(ABP)比较氯噻酮 6.25mg 每日剂量与 HCTZ 12.5mg 每日剂量的疗效。由于 HCTZ 被认为是一种短效药物,因此添加了与延长释放制剂(HCTZ-CR)的第三次比较。
这是一项为期 12 周的比较、双盲、门诊研究,将 54 名 1 期高血压患者随机分为氯噻酮 6.25mg(n=16)、HCTZ 12.5mg(n=18)或 HCTZ-CR 12.5mg(n=20)组。在基线和治疗 4 周和 12 周时进行 ABP 监测。
所有 3 种治疗方法均显著(p<0.01)降低了第 4 周和第 12 周时的诊室血压。在第 4 周和第 12 周时,氯噻酮可显著降低收缩压和舒张压 24 小时动态和夜间 ABP(p<0.01),而 HCTZ 则不能。在第 4 周(p=0.015)和第 12 周(p=0.020)时,氯噻酮组的夜间收缩压明显低于 HCTZ 组。在 HCTZ 治疗组,持续性高血压转化为隐匿性高血压。与 HCTZ 组相比,HCTZ-CR 组的 24 小时 ABP 也显著降低(p<0.01)。所有 3 种治疗方法通常是安全且耐受良好的。
每日低剂量氯噻酮 6.25mg 可显著降低平均 24 小时 ABP 以及白天和夜间血压。由于其作用时间短,HCTZ 12.5mg 每日剂量并未显著降低 24 小时 ABP,仅将持续性高血压转化为隐匿性高血压。因此,低剂量氯噻酮 6.25mg 可作为原发性高血压的单药治疗,而低剂量 HCTZ 单药治疗则不是一种合适的降压药物。(氯噻酮、氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮在 1 期原发性高血压患者中的安全性和疗效比较评估;CTRI/2013/07/003793)。