Suppr超能文献

氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压患者心血管结局的比较

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients.

作者信息

Lim Subin, Kim Ju Hyeon, Oh Seungmi, Hong Soon Jun, Yu Cheol Woong, Joo Hyung Joon, Kim Yong Hyun, Kim Eung Ju

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Feb;27(2):e70000. doi: 10.1111/jch.70000.

Abstract

Chlorthalidone (CLTD) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are widely used thiazide diuretics for hypertension management. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated with CLTD versus HCTZ. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korea University Medical Center, derived from electronic health records. A total of 14 257 hypertensive patients treated with either CLTD (n = 1920) or HCTZ (n = 12 337) were identified. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, resulting in 1606 patients in each treatment group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and safety profiles were analyzed. Baseline characteristics after propensity score matching were well balanced between the two groups. The average age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years for CLTD users, with 59.3% being male. The 3-year MACE occurred in 1.2% of the CLTD group compared with 1.4% of the HCTZ group (hazard ratio 0.91, p = 0.77). For secondary outcomes, cardiovascular mortality was 0.2% in both groups (p = 0.92). Myocardial infarction occurred in 0.3% of CLTD users and 0.4% of HCTZ users (p = 0.65). The incidence of hypokalemia was 19.2% in the CLTD group versus 16.7% in the HCTZ group (p = 0.07). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, CLTD and HCTZ showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles.

摘要

氯噻酮(CLTD)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)是广泛用于治疗高血压的噻嗪类利尿剂。本研究旨在评估和比较接受CLTD与HCTZ治疗患者的心血管结局。这项多中心回顾性队列研究利用了来自韩国大学医学中心电子健康记录中的数据。共确定了14257例接受CLTD(n = 1920)或HCTZ(n = 12337)治疗的高血压患者。使用倾向得分将患者按1:1匹配,每个治疗组有1606例患者。分析了人口统计学和临床特征、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率和安全性。倾向得分匹配后的基线特征在两组之间达到良好平衡。CLTD使用者的平均年龄为61.8±14.6岁,男性占59.3%。CLTD组3年MACE发生率为1.2%,而HCTZ组为1.4%(风险比0.91,p = 0.77)。对于次要结局,两组的心血管死亡率均为0.2%(p = 0.92)。CLTD使用者中心肌梗死发生率为0.3%,HCTZ使用者为0.4%(p = 0.65)。CLTD组低钾血症发生率为19.2%,HCTZ组为16.7%(p = 0.07)。总之,在高血压患者中,CLTD和HCTZ显示出相当的心血管结局和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ba/11831197/a5976558c3c2/JCH-27-e70000-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验