Suppr超能文献

氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压患者的有效性和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Khenhrani Raja Ram, Nnodebe Ijeoma, Rawat Anurag, Adwani Rahul, Ghaffar Ammara, Devi Sapna, Afzal Muhammad Sohaib, Usama Muhammad

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.

Medicine, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):e38184. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38184. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension. The present meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search for relevant articles was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHIL databases from their inception until March 31, 2023. Keywords used to search for relevant articles included "hydrochlorothiazide," "chlortalidone," "hypertension," "cardiovascular," and "blood pressure." The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality were also assessed. For safety analysis, we evaluated the risk of hypokalemia between the two groups. Any disagreement between the two authors in the data extraction process was resolved through discussion. Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria included in the present meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that chlorthalidone was superior to hydrochlorothiazide in controlling both SBP and DBP, with no significant heterogeneity reported. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization due to heart failure. The hypokalemia rate was reported to be higher with chlorthalidone compared to hydrochlorothiazide.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪在高血压患者中的有效性和安全性。本荟萃分析是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行报告的。我们对PubMed、Scopus和CINAHIL数据库从创建至2023年3月31日进行了相关文章检索。用于检索相关文章的关键词包括“氢氯噻嗪”、“氯噻酮”、“高血压”、“心血管”和“血压”。本荟萃分析评估的结果包括收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的变化。还评估了心肌梗死、中风和全因死亡率。对于安全性分析,我们评估了两组之间低钾血症的风险。在数据提取过程中,两位作者之间的任何分歧都通过讨论得到了解决。八项研究符合本荟萃分析纳入标准。我们的分析表明,氯噻酮在控制SBP和DBP方面优于氢氯噻嗪,且未报告显著异质性。然而,两组在心肌梗死、中风、全因死亡率和因心力衰竭住院的风险方面没有显著差异。据报告,氯噻酮的低钾血症发生率高于氢氯噻嗪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5308/10220471/71e01abdeed8/cureus-0015-00000038184-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验