Suppr超能文献

糖尿病周围神经病变治疗的系统评价

Systematic review of treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

作者信息

Çakici N, Fakkel T M, van Neck J W, Verhagen A P, Coert J H

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2016 Nov;33(11):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/dme.13083. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate treatment options for neuropathic pain and sensory symptoms resulting from diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Embase and Web-of-Science were searched for randomized controlled trials, published in the period from database inception to 2 July 2015, that evaluated treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet with placebo or standard treatment as comparators. Participants in these trials included people with diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy who were given any treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Delphi list of criteria. Data from the trials were extracted using standardized data extraction sheets by two authors independently. All analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2. In case of clinical homogeneity, statistical pooling was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

This review included 27 trials on pharmacological, non-pharmacological and alternative treatments. In the meta-analysis of trials of α-lipoic acid versus placebo, total symptom score was reduced by -2.45 (95% CI -4.52; -0.39) with 600 mg i.v. α-lipoic acid (three trials), and was reduced by -1.95 (95% CI -2.89; -1.01) with 600 mg oral α-lipoic acid (two trials). Significant improvements in diabetic peripheral neuropathy symptoms were found with opioids, botulinum toxin A, mexidol, reflexology and Thai foot massage, but not with micronutrients, neurotrophic peptide ORG 2677 and photon stimulation therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we found that α-lipoic acid, opioids, botulinum toxin A, mexidol, reflexology and Thai foot massage had significant beneficial results.

摘要

目的

评估足部糖尿病周围神经病变所致神经性疼痛和感觉症状的治疗方案。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库,查找从数据库建立至2015年7月2日期间发表的随机对照试验,这些试验以安慰剂或标准治疗作为对照,评估足部糖尿病周围神经病变的治疗。这些试验的参与者包括患有糖尿病和糖尿病周围神经病变且接受过任何糖尿病周围神经病变治疗的患者。使用德尔菲标准列表评估偏倚风险。两位作者独立使用标准化数据提取表提取试验数据。所有分析均使用RevMan 5.2进行。若临床具有同质性,则使用随机效应模型进行统计合并。

结果

本综述纳入了27项关于药物、非药物和替代治疗的试验。在α-硫辛酸与安慰剂对比试验的荟萃分析中,静脉注射600mgα-硫辛酸(三项试验)使总症状评分降低了-2.45(95%CI -4.52;-0.39),口服600mgα-硫辛酸(两项试验)使总症状评分降低了-1.95(95%CI -2.89;-1.01)。阿片类药物、肉毒毒素A、美西多、反射疗法和泰式足部按摩能显著改善糖尿病周围神经病变症状,但微量营养素、神经营养肽ORG 2677和光子刺激疗法则不能。

结论

在本综述中,我们发现α-硫辛酸、阿片类药物、肉毒毒素A、美西多、反射疗法和泰式足部按摩有显著的有益效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验