Odland Hans Henrik, Holm Torbjørn, Cornelussen Richard, Kongsgård Erik
Department of Cardiology and Pediatric Cardiology, Section for Arrhythmias, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Cardiology, Section for Arrhythmias, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 15;9:979581. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.979581. eCollection 2022.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is helpful in selected patients; however, responder rates rarely exceed 70%. Optimization of CRT may therefore benefit a large number of patients. Time-to-peak dP/dt (Td) is a novel marker of myocardial synergy that reflects the degree of myocardial dyssynchrony with the potential to guide and optimize treatment with CRT. Optimal electrical activation is a prerequisite for CRT to be effective. Electrical activation can be altered by changing the electrical wave-front fusion resulting from pacing to optimize resynchronization. We designed this study to understand the acute effects of different electrical wave-front fusion strategies and LV pre-/postexcitation on Td and QRS duration (QRSd). A better understanding of measuring and optimizing resynchronization can help improve the benefits of CRT.
Td and QRSd were measured in 19 patients undergoing a CRT implantation. Two biventricular pacing groups were compared: pacing the left ventricle (LV) with fusion with intrinsic right ventricular activation (FUSION group) and pacing the LV and right ventricle (RV) at short atrioventricular delay (STANDARD group) to avoid fusion with intrinsic RV activation. A quadripolar LV lead enabled pacing from widely separated electrodes; distal (DIST), proximal (PROX) and both electrodes combined (multipoint pacing, MPP). The LV was stimulated relative in time to RV activation (either RV pace-onset or QRS-onset), with the LV stimulated prior to (PRE), simultaneous with (SIM) or after (POST) RV activation. In addition, we analyzed the interactions of the two groups (FUSION/STANDARD) with three different electrode configurations (DIST, PROX, MPP), each paced with three different degrees of LV pre-/postexcitation (PRE, SIM, POST) in a statistical model.
We found that FUSION provided shorter Td and QRSd than STANDARD, MPP provided shorter Td and QRSd than DIST and PROX, and SIM provided both the shortest QRSd and Td compared to PRE and POST. The interaction analysis revealed that pacing MPP with fusion with intrinsic RV activation simultaneous with the onset of the QRS complex (MPPFUSIONSIM) shortened QRSd and Td the most compared to all other modes and configurations. The difference in QRSd and Td from their respective references were significantly correlated (β = 1, R = 0.9, < 0.01).
Pacing modes and electrode configurations designed to optimize electrical wave-front fusion (intrinsic RV activation, LV multipoint pacing and simultaneous RV and LV activation) shorten QRSd and Td the most. As demonstrated in this study, electrical and mechanical measures of resynchronization are highly correlated. Therefore, Td can potentially serve as a marker for CRT optimization.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对部分患者有益;然而,反应率很少超过70%。因此,优化CRT可能使大量患者受益。达峰dP/dt时间(Td)是一种反映心肌不同步程度的心肌协同作用新标志物,有潜力指导和优化CRT治疗。最佳电激动是CRT起效的前提条件。通过改变起搏导致的电波前融合来优化再同步,可改变电激动。我们设计本研究以了解不同电波前融合策略及左心室预激/后激对Td和QRS波时限(QRSd)的急性影响。更好地理解测量和优化再同步有助于提高CRT的获益。
在19例接受CRT植入的患者中测量Td和QRSd。比较两个双心室起搏组:左心室起搏与固有右心室激动融合(融合组)和左心室与右心室在短房室延迟下起搏(标准组)以避免与固有右心室激动融合。四极左心室导线可从相距较远的电极起搏;远端(DIST)、近端(PROX)以及两个电极联合(多点起搏,MPP)。左心室刺激相对于右心室激动在时间上(右心室起搏起始或QRS起始),左心室刺激在右心室激动之前(PRE)、同时(SIM)或之后(POST)。此外,我们在一个统计模型中分析了两组(融合组/标准组)与三种不同电极配置(DIST、PROX、MPP)的相互作用,每组以三种不同程度的左心室预激/后激(PRE、SIM、POST)起搏。
我们发现融合组的Td和QRSd比标准组短,MPP组的Td和QRSd比DIST组和PROX组短,与PRE组和POST组相比,SIM组的QRSd和Td均最短。交互分析显示,与所有其他模式和配置相比,在QRS波群起始时左心室多点起搏与固有右心室激动融合(MPPFUSIONSIM)使QRSd和Td缩短最多。QRSd和Td与其各自对照的差异显著相关(β = 1,R = 0.9,P < 0.01)。
旨在优化电波前融合的起搏模式和电极配置(固有右心室激动、左心室多点起搏以及右心室和左心室同时激动)使QRSd和Td缩短最多。如本研究所示,再同步的电和机械指标高度相关。因此,Td有可能作为CRT优化的标志物。