Mantuani Daniel, Frazee Bradley W, Fahimi Jahan, Nagdev Arun
Alameda Health System Highland Campus, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California.
University of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):46-53. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.11.28525. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Determining the etiology of acute dyspnea in emregency department (ED) patients is often difficult. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) holds promise for improving immediate diagnostic accuracy (after history and physical), thus improving use of focused therapies. We evaluate the impact of a three-part POCUS exam, or "triple scan" (TS) - composed of abbreviated echocardiography, lung ultrasound and inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility assessment - on the treating physician's immediate diagnostic impression.
A convenience sample of adults presenting to our urban academic ED with acute dyspnea (Emergency Severity Index 1, 2) were prospectively enrolled when investigator sonographers were available. The method for performing components of the TS has been previously described in detail. Treating physicians rated the most likely diagnosis after history and physical but before other studies (except electrocardiogram) returned. An investigator then performed TS and disclosed the results, after which most likely diagnosis was reassessed. Final diagnosis (criterion standard) was based on medical record review by expert emergency medicine faculty blinded to TS result. We compared accuracy of pre-TS and post-TS impression (primary outcome) with McNemar's test. Test characteristics for treating physician impression were also calculated by dichotomizing acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia as present or absent.
57 patients were enrolled with the leading final diagnoses being ADHF (26%), COPD/asthma (30%), and pneumonia (28%). Overall accuracy of the treating physician's impression increased from 53% before TS to 77% after TS (p=0.003). The post-TS impression was 100% sensitive and 84% specific for ADHF.
In this small study, POCUS evaluation of the heart, lungs and IVC improved the treating physician's immediate overall diagnostic accuracy for ADHF, COPD/asthma and pneumonia and was particularly useful to immediately exclude ADHF as the cause of acute dyspnea.
确定急诊科(ED)患者急性呼吸困难的病因通常很困难。即时超声检查(POCUS)有望提高即时诊断准确性(在病史和体格检查之后),从而改善针对性治疗的应用。我们评估了由简化超声心动图、肺部超声和下腔静脉(IVC)可塌陷性评估组成的三部分POCUS检查,即“三联扫描”(TS)对主治医生即时诊断印象的影响。
当有超声检查人员时,前瞻性纳入了到我们城市学术性急诊科就诊且患有急性呼吸困难(急诊严重程度指数为1、2)的成年便利样本。TS各组成部分的执行方法先前已详细描述。主治医生在病史和体格检查后但在其他检查(心电图除外)结果返回之前对最可能的诊断进行评分。然后一名检查人员进行TS并公布结果,之后重新评估最可能的诊断。最终诊断(标准对照)基于对TS结果不知情的急诊医学专家教员对病历的审查。我们使用McNemar检验比较了TS前和TS后印象的准确性(主要结果)。还通过将急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和肺炎分为存在或不存在来计算主治医生印象的检验特征。
纳入了57例患者,最终主要诊断为ADHF(26%)、COPD/哮喘(30%)和肺炎(28%)。主治医生印象的总体准确性从TS前的53%提高到TS后的77%(p = 0.003)。TS后的印象对ADHF的敏感性为100%,特异性为84%。
在这项小型研究中,对心脏、肺部和IVC进行POCUS评估提高了主治医生对ADHF、COPD/哮喘和肺炎的即时总体诊断准确性,并且对于立即排除ADHF作为急性呼吸困难的病因特别有用。