Kizito Prisca Mary, Bagonza Kenneth Daniel, Odakha Justine Athieno, Nalugya Linda Grace, Opejo Pius, Muyingo Anthony, Chen Harry, Harborne Derek
Faculty of Medicine, Emergency Medicine Department, Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST), Uganda.
Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Uganda.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;13(2):61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized imaging modalities has many limitations, and the gold standard (Computed Tomography scan) is inaccessible. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is more available and increasingly being used, however little is known of its performance in resource limited EDs. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PoCUS compared with CXR in identifying the causes of hypoxia in the medical ED.
49 adults presenting with hypoxia (SP02 ≤ 88%) in the medical ED were evaluated. Ultrasound of the lungs and heart (PoCUS) was done, then CXR obtained. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was compared with CXR (first reference standard). Chest X-Ray and PoCUS were each compared to the physician diagnosis (second reference standard) to determine agreement using an acceptable disagreement cut-off of 15%.
31% more abnormalities were identified by LUS than CXR. Lung ultrasound findings agreed with CXR in 86% of the participants with moderate reliability (ĸ=0.75). There was no significant difference between the actual findings of the two tests (X= 2, p 0.1). Using the second reference, 82% of the CXRs were similar with weak reliability (ĸ=0.5) compared to 98% of PoCUS findings with strong reliability (ĸ=0.9). Compared to PoCUS, CXRs significantly differed from the physician diagnosis (X= 0.85, p 0.38 vs X= 8.5, p 0.004 respectively).
Overall, PoCUS was not inferior to CXR when compared to final physician diagnosis in identifying causes of hypoxia, and LUS and CXR had comparable performance. Significantly more abnormalities were identified on PoCUS and it demonstrated better agreement and strong reliability with the physician diagnosis than CXR. We recommend PoCUS use in patients with hypoxia attending resource limited in- and pre-hospital settings.
低氧血症是全球急诊科常见的症状。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,9%至12%的住院成年人受其影响。及时诊断诸如肺炎、心力衰竭等多种病因具有挑战性。胸部X光检查(CXR)是最常用的成像方式之一,但有诸多局限性,且金标准(计算机断层扫描)难以获取。床旁超声检查(PoCUS)更易获得且使用越来越广泛,然而其在资源有限的急诊科的表现鲜为人知。本研究旨在评估PoCUS与CXR在诊断内科急诊科低氧血症病因方面的诊断性能。
对49名在内科急诊科出现低氧血症(血氧饱和度≤88%)的成年人进行评估。先进行肺部和心脏的超声检查(PoCUS),然后进行胸部X光检查(CXR)。将肺部超声检查(LUS)与CXR(首个参考标准)进行比较。将胸部X光检查和PoCUS分别与医生诊断(第二个参考标准)进行比较,以确定一致性,可接受的分歧阈值为15%。
肺部超声检查发现的异常比胸部X光检查多31%。在86%的参与者中,肺部超声检查结果与CXR结果一致,可靠性中等(ĸ = 0.75)。两项检查的实际结果之间无显著差异(X = 2,p > 0.1)。以第二个参考标准来看,82%的胸部X光检查结果相似,可靠性较弱(ĸ = 0.5),而98%的PoCUS检查结果可靠性较强(ĸ = 0.9)。与PoCUS相比,胸部X光检查结果与医生诊断有显著差异(分别为X = 0.85,p > 0.38 与 X = 8.5,p < 0.004)。
总体而言,在诊断低氧血症病因方面,与最终医生诊断相比,PoCUS并不逊色于CXR,且LUS和CXR表现相当。PoCUS发现的异常明显更多,与医生诊断的一致性更好,可靠性更强。我们建议在资源有限的医院内和院前环境中,对低氧血症患者使用PoCUS。