St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Addiction. 2016 Aug;111(8):1337-46. doi: 10.1111/add.13328. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
To assess the efficacy of topiramate in treating cocaine use disorder (i.e. retention, efficacy, safety and craving reduction) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched six scientific databases from inception to 23 December 2014 with no date limits. Data were reviewed, extracted and analysed systematically. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed randomized control trials with participants meeting diagnostic criteria for cocaine dependence or cocaine use disorder, with the treatment arm involving topiramate with or without psychosocial intervention, and the control arm involving no intervention or psychosocial intervention with or without placebo. A random-effects meta-analytical model was computed.
Five studies met inclusion criteria (n = 518). Topiramate was compared with placebo (four studies) and no medication (one study). In a meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between topiramate and placebo in improving treatment retention risk ratio (RR) = 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60-1.22, P = 0.38. However, compared with a placebo, use of topiramate was associated with increased continuous abstinence in two of five studies (RR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.31-4.53, P = 0.005). No differences were observed in frequency of adverse effects reported between topiramate and placebo (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91-1.23, P = 0.48). Topiramate was associated significantly (P < 0.05) with a reduction in craving in only one of five studies.
Evidence does not currently support the use of topiramate to improve treatment retention for cocaine use disorder, although it may extend cocaine abstinence with a similar risk of adverse events compared with placebo.
通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估托吡酯治疗可卡因使用障碍(即保留率、疗效、安全性和减少渴望)的疗效。
我们从建库到 2014 年 12 月 23 日,无时间限制地在六个科学数据库中进行了检索。系统地审查、提取和分析了数据。如果研究为符合可卡因依赖或可卡因使用障碍诊断标准的参与者的同行评议随机对照试验,治疗组为托吡酯联合或不联合心理社会干预,对照组为不干预或心理社会干预联合或不联合安慰剂,则纳入研究。计算了随机效应荟萃分析模型。
五项研究符合纳入标准(n=518)。托吡酯与安慰剂(四项研究)和无药物(一项研究)进行了比较。荟萃分析中,我们未观察到托吡酯与安慰剂在提高治疗保留率风险比(RR)方面有显著差异[RR=0.85;95%置信区间(CI)=0.60-1.22,P=0.38]。然而,与安慰剂相比,在五项研究中的两项研究中,使用托吡酯与增加连续禁欲相关[RR=2.43;95%CI=1.31-4.53,P=0.005]。托吡酯与安慰剂之间报告的不良反应频率无差异[RR=1.06;95%CI=0.91-1.23,P=0.48]。在五项研究中的一项研究中,托吡酯与渴望减少显著相关(P<0.05)。
目前没有证据支持使用托吡酯来提高可卡因使用障碍的治疗保留率,尽管与安慰剂相比,它可能延长可卡因戒断期,但不良反应的风险相似。