Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Section, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Section, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Jun;24(6):973-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.136. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
Ultrasonography (US) demonstrated to be a promising tool for the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease (CPPD). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to collect the definitions for the US elementary lesions and to summarize the available data about US diagnostic accuracy in CPPD.
We systematically reviewed all the studies that considered US as the index test for CPPD diagnosis without restrictions about the reference test or that provided definitions about US identification of CPPD. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each study and definitions were extrapolated. Subgroup analyses were planned by anatomical site included in the index text and different reference standards.
Thirty-seven studies were included in this review. All the studies were eligible for the collection of US findings and all definitions were summarized. US description of elementary lesions appeared heterogeneous among the studies. Regarding US accuracy, 13 articles entered in the meta-analysis. Considering each joint structure, the sensitivity ranged between 0.77 (0.63-0.87) and 0.34 (0.16-0.58) while the specificity varies between 1.00 (0.89-1.00) and 0.92 (0.16-1.00). Considering the reference standards used, the sensibility ranged between 0.34 (0.02-0.65) and 0.87 (0.76-0.99) while specificity ranged between 0.84 (0.52-1.00) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00).
US is potentially a useful tool for the diagnosis of CPPD but universally accepted definitions and further testing are necessary in order to assess the role of the technique in the diagnostic process.
超声检查(US)已被证明是诊断焦磷酸钙二水合物沉积病(CPPD)的一种很有前途的工具。本系统文献回顾(SLR)的目的是收集 US 基本病变的定义,并总结关于 CPPD 的 US 诊断准确性的现有数据。
我们系统地回顾了所有将 US 作为 CPPD 诊断的参考测试的研究,而不限制参考测试或提供关于 US 识别 CPPD 的定义。计算了每个研究的敏感性和特异性,并推断出定义。按索引文本中包含的解剖部位和不同的参考标准进行了亚组分析。
本综述共纳入 37 项研究。所有研究均符合收集 US 结果的条件,所有定义均进行了总结。研究之间 US 对基本病变的描述存在异质性。关于 US 准确性,有 13 篇文章进入荟萃分析。考虑到每个关节结构,敏感性范围为 0.77(0.63-0.87)至 0.34(0.16-0.58),特异性范围为 1.00(0.89-1.00)至 0.92(0.16-1.00)。考虑到使用的参考标准,敏感性范围为 0.34(0.02-0.65)至 0.87(0.76-0.99),特异性范围为 0.84(0.52-1.00)至 1.00(0.99-1.00)。
US 可能是诊断 CPPD 的有用工具,但需要普遍接受的定义和进一步的测试,以评估该技术在诊断过程中的作用。