• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大块牙本质替代与分层放置树脂复合材料:一项随机对照临床试验。

Bulk dentine replacement versus incrementally placed resin composite: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Hickey D, Sharif O, Janjua F, Brunton P A

机构信息

General Dental Practitioner, Chorley, Lancashire, UK.

Orthodontist, Eastman Dental Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Dent. 2016 Mar;46:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.011
PMID:26826329
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled clinical trial compared two techniques and materials for restoring carious teeth-Bulk dentine replacement versus incremental placement of a hybrid posterior resin composite material in terms of patient comfort (post operative sensitivity and tenderness on biting).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-two carious teeth were randomized to one of two treatment groups: Group A-were restored with a bulk dentine replacement material or Group B-restored with incrementally placed hybrid composite. Patients were followed up by way of a structured phone call at day 2 and day 7 post-operatively. Patients reporting discomfort at day 7 were subsequently followed up on days 14, and 30.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up. At day 2, 18/72 restored teeth had post-operative sensitivity; this figure fell to 10/72 at day 7. A Chi squared test revealed that at day 2 a greater level of sensitivity was reported by patients in Group A (P=0.029). However, at day 7 there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of sensitivity (P=0.453). 8/72 and 6 /72 teeth had tenderness to biting at days 2 and 7 respectively. A Chi squared test revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of tenderness on biting at any time period (P=0.722). Interestingly, Class I cavities were found to be more tender on biting than Class II cavities. At day 30 2/72 teeth exhibited sensitivity and none of the teeth exhibiting tenderness on biting.

CONCLUSION

At day 7 there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative sensitivity and tenderness on biting.

摘要

目的

本随机对照临床试验比较了两种治疗龋齿的技术和材料——大块牙本质替代法与混合后牙树脂复合材料分层充填法,比较指标为患者舒适度(术后敏感性和咬合压痛)。

材料与方法

72颗龋齿被随机分为两个治疗组之一:A组用大块牙本质替代材料修复,B组用混合复合材料分层充填修复。术后第2天和第7天通过结构化电话随访患者。术后第7天报告有不适的患者随后在第14天和第30天接受随访。

结果

所有患者均得到随访。术后第2天,72颗修复牙中有18颗有术后敏感性;这一数字在术后第7天降至10/72。卡方检验显示,术后第2天A组患者报告的敏感性水平更高(P=0.029)。然而,在术后第7天,两组之间在敏感性方面无统计学显著差异(P=0.453)。术后第2天和第7天分别有8/72和6/72颗牙有咬合压痛。卡方检验显示,在任何时间段,两组之间在咬合压痛方面均无统计学显著差异(P=0.722)。有趣的是,发现Ⅰ类洞比Ⅱ类洞在咬合时更压痛。在术后第30天,72颗牙中有2颗表现出敏感性,没有牙齿表现出咬合压痛。

结论

在术后第7天,两组在术后敏感性和咬合压痛方面无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Bulk dentine replacement versus incrementally placed resin composite: A randomised controlled clinical trial.大块牙本质替代与分层放置树脂复合材料:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2016 Mar;46:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
2
Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.关于深咬合树脂复合材料修复中未使用玻璃离子衬层引发的术后牙髓并发症的两年临床研究。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 Nov;4(4):265-70. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00160.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.离体龋牙树脂复合材料修复后的流体流动情况。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;117(3):334-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00616.x.
4
Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.使用树脂基复合材料的两种不同修复技术对微渗漏的影响。
Am J Dent. 2004 Apr;17(2):99-103.
5
Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.有和无咬合磨损小平面的非龋性颈部病变中树脂复合材料修复体的失败模式比较。
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.乳牙一步法不完全和完全窝洞预备后复合树脂修复体24个月生存率的随机对照临床试验
J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Restorations performance after selective caries removal to soft dentine: 18-month follow-up of a controlled clinical trial.选择性去龋至软化牙本质后修复体的性能:一项为期 18 个月的对照临床试验随访。
J Dent. 2024 Aug;147:105099. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105099. Epub 2024 May 24.
8
Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: a microbiological evaluation.常规龋去除和恒牙封闭龋:微生物学评价。
J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
9
Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.高 C 因素窝洞树脂复合材料修复体的耐用性:12 年随访。
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
10
Bond strength and ultimate tensile strength of resin composite filled into dentine cavity; effect of bulk and incremental filling technique.填充于牙本质窝洞的树脂复合材料的粘结强度和极限拉伸强度;整块充填和分层充填技术的影响。
J Dent. 2008 Mar;36(3):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of repeated preheating of bulk-fill resin composite on postoperative hypersensitivity; a randomized controlled clinical trial.大块充填型树脂反复预热对术后敏感的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04170-4.
2
The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review.大体积充填与分层直接树脂复合材料修复体临床性能的比较:系统评价。
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Sep;24(3):143. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00905-4. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
3
Is the clinical performance of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth similar if restored with incremental or bulk-filling techniques? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
在后牙中,使用分层堆积或团块充填技术修复时,复合树脂修复体的临床性能是否相似?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2281-2297. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04337-1. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Effect of extended light activation and increment thickness on physical properties of conventional and bulk-filled resin-based composites.延长光激活时间和增加厚度对传统和块状填充型树脂基复合材料物理性能的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):3141-3150. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04296-7. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.后牙修复随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性:方法学的系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):41-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04198-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions.两种具有不同基体组成的树脂复合材料的评估。
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;8(3):76. doi: 10.3390/dj8030076.
7
No more amalgams: Use of amalgam and amalgam alternative materials in primary dental care.不再使用汞合金:乳牙保健中汞合金及汞合金替代材料的应用
Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 27;225(2):171-176. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.538.
8
Teaching posterior resin composites in UK and Ireland dental schools: do current teaching programmes match the expectation of clinical practice arrangements?英国和爱尔兰牙科学校中后牙树脂复合材料的教学:当前的教学计划是否符合临床实践安排的期望?
Br Dent J. 2018 Jun 22;224(12):967-972. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.446.
9
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙应用大体积充填和传统树脂复合材料修复的临床性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7. Epub 2018 Mar 28.