Suppr超能文献

住宅草原花园对威斯康星州麦迪逊市城市土壤物理性质的影响。

Impact of Residential Prairie Gardens on the Physical Properties of Urban Soil in Madison, Wisconsin.

作者信息

Johnston Marie R, Balster Nick J, Zhu Jun

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2016 Jan;45(1):45-52. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0093.

Abstract

Prairie gardens have become a common addition to residential communities in the midwestern United States because prairie vegetation is native to the region, requires fewer resources to maintain than turfgrass, and has been promoted to help remediate urban soil. Although prairie systems typically have deeper and more diverse root systems than traditional turfgrass, no one has tested the effect of this vegetation type on the physical properties of urban soil. We hypothesized that residential prairie gardens would yield lower soil bulk density (BD), lower penetration resistance (PR), greater soil organic matter (SOM), and greater saturated hydraulic conductivity () compared with turfgrass lawns. To test this hypothesis, we examined 12 residential properties in Madison, WI, where homeowners had established a prairie garden within their turfgrass lawn. Despite a consistent trend in the difference between vegetation types, no significant main effects were found (i.e., a difference between vegetation types when averaged over depth) for any of the four soil properties measured in this study. Differences were found with depth and depended on a significant interaction with vegetation type. At the surface depth (0-0.15 m), soil beneath prairie gardens had 10% lower mean BD, 15% lower mean PR, 25% greater level of SOM, and 33% greater compared with soil beneath the adjacent lawns. These differences were not detected at deeper sampling intervals of 0.15 to 0.30 m and 0.30 to 0.45 m. Although not statistically significant, the consistent trend and direction among soil variables suggest that residential prairie gardens had changed the surface soil at a rate that marginally outpaced turfgrass and calls for controlled experiments to identify the mechanisms that might enhance these trends.

摘要

在美国中西部,草原花园已成为住宅社区常见的新增景观,因为草原植被原产于该地区,与草坪草相比维护所需资源更少,并且被推广用于帮助修复城市土壤。尽管草原系统的根系通常比传统草坪草更深且更多样,但尚无研究测试这种植被类型对城市土壤物理性质的影响。我们假设,与草坪草草坪相比,住宅草原花园的土壤容重(BD)更低、穿透阻力(PR)更低、土壤有机质(SOM)更高、饱和导水率()更高。为验证这一假设,我们考察了威斯康星州麦迪逊市的12处住宅物业,这些住宅的业主在草坪草草坪内打造了草原花园。尽管不同植被类型之间的差异呈现出一致趋势,但本研究测量的四种土壤性质均未发现显著的主效应(即,平均深度上植被类型之间的差异)。发现差异与深度有关,并且取决于与植被类型的显著交互作用。在表层深度(0 - 0.15米),与相邻草坪下方的土壤相比,草原花园下方土壤的平均BD低10%,平均PR低15%,SOM水平高25%,高33%。在0.15至0.30米和0.30至0.45米的更深采样间隔中未检测到这些差异。尽管没有统计学意义,但土壤变量之间一致的趋势和方向表明,住宅草原花园改变表层土壤的速度略快于草坪草,这需要进行对照实验来确定可能增强这些趋势的机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验