Leone Ruschelle M, Crane Cory A, Parrott Dominic J, Eckhardt Christopher I
Department of Psychology.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 May;30(3):356-66. doi: 10.1037/adb0000159. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
Alcohol use and impulsivity are 2 known risk factors for intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study examined the independent and interactive effects of problematic drinking and 5 facets of impulsivity (i.e., negative urgency, positive urgency, sensation seeking, lack of premeditation, and lack of perseverance) on perpetration of physical IPV within a dyadic framework. Participants were 289 heavy drinking heterosexual couples (total N = 578) with a recent history of psychological and/or physical IPV recruited from 2 metropolitan U.S. cities. Parallel multilevel actor partner interdependence models were used and demonstrated actor problematic drinking, negative urgency, and lack of perseverance were associated with physical IPV. Findings also revealed associations between partner problematic drinking and physical IPV as well as significant Partner Problematic Drinking × Actor Impulsivity (Negative Urgency and Positive Urgency) interaction effects on physical IPV. Findings highlight the importance of examining IPV within a dyadic framework and are interpreted using the I3 metatheoretical model. (PsycINFO Database Record
饮酒和冲动是亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的两个已知风险因素。当前的研究在二元框架内考察了问题饮酒和冲动的五个方面(即消极紧迫性、积极紧迫性、寻求刺激、缺乏预谋和缺乏毅力)对身体IPV perpetration的独立和交互作用。参与者是从美国两个大都市招募的289对有心理和/或身体IPV近期病史的重度饮酒异性恋夫妇(总N = 578)。使用了平行多层次行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型,结果表明行为者的问题饮酒、消极紧迫性和缺乏毅力与身体IPV有关。研究结果还揭示了伴侣问题饮酒与身体IPV之间的关联,以及伴侣问题饮酒×行为者冲动性(消极紧迫性和积极紧迫性)对身体IPV的显著交互作用。研究结果强调了在二元框架内研究IPV的重要性,并使用I3元理论模型进行了解释。(PsycINFO数据库记录