Jones R R, Rorer L G
Multivariate Behav Res. 1973 Jan 1;8(3):313-30. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0803_3.
Twenty subject response parameters, including scales to measure re- sponse reliability, content and acquiescence variance, social desirability, yea- and nay-saying, and extremeness response style were obtained for 88 college students, based on 89 pairs of adjecCives oppoSrite both in content and in social desirability. Test-retest item reversal methodology was used to evaluate the possible effects of these biases on responses to the trait-descriptive adjectives. Individual differences in response bias propensities were studied among the various subject response parameters, and in relation to scale scores from the 16 PF, MMPI, and CPI. The results supported a content rather than bias interpretation of the subjects' selfdescriptions for the adjectives. Additionally, no useful associations were found between measures of personality characteristics and response biases.
基于89对在内容和社会期望性上都相反的形容词，为88名大学生获取了20个受试者反应参数，包括用于测量反应可靠性、内容和默认方差、社会期望性、肯定和否定回答以及极端反应风格的量表。采用重测项目反转方法来评估这些偏差对特质描述形容词反应的可能影响。研究了不同受试者反应参数之间以及与16种人格因素问卷（16PF）、明尼苏达多相人格测验（MMPI）和加州心理调查表（CPI）的量表分数相关的反应偏差倾向的个体差异。结果支持了对受试者对形容词的自我描述采用内容而非偏差的解释。此外，未发现人格特征测量与反应偏差之间存在有用的关联。
