Gregory R J, Morris L M
J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):258-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_6.
In a replication of a ten-year-old study by Gough, peer-rated adjectives from the Adjective Check List were correlated with scores on the 18 standard scales of the California Psychological Inventroy (CPI) for 95 college sorority members. For each scale, the ten most positively and negatively correlated adjectives were selected for comparison with Gough's results. The absolute magnitude of the correlations, the qualitative content of the adjectives, and the degree of correspondence with Gough's findings were used to assess the extent to which each CPI scale achieved its stated objective.
在一项对戈夫十年前的研究进行的复制研究中，从《形容词检查表》中选取了由同伴评定的形容词，并将其与95名大学女生联谊会成员在加利福尼亚心理调查表（CPI）的18个标准量表上的得分进行了关联分析。对于每个量表，选取了相关性最强的十个正向和负向形容词，与戈夫的研究结果进行比较。通过相关性的绝对大小、形容词的定性内容以及与戈夫研究结果的对应程度，来评估每个CPI量表实现其既定目标的程度。
