Serizawa Satoshi, Ohkoshi Kishiko, Minowa Yuko, Soejima Kumiko
a Department of Ophthalmology , St. Luke's International Hospital , Tokyo , Japan.
b Department of Anesthesiology , St. Luke's International Hospital , Tokyo , Japan.
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Sep;41(9):1229-34. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1113430. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
To investigate whether the integrity of the interdigitation zone band, the ellipsoid zone band, and the external limiting membrane are reliable markers of treatment outcome in diabetic macular edema (DME).
In this retrospective study, we examined 41 treatment-naïve eyes (38 patients) with DME that were treated with laser therapy, pharmacotherapy, and/or vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity and the integrity of the interdigitation zone band, the ellipsoid zone band, and the external limiting membrane were assessed before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months after DME treatment.
One year after treatment, the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone band, and interdigitation zone band were completely visible in 30 (73.2%), 24 (58.5%), and 2 (4.9%) eyes, respectively. Interdigitation zone band status improved significantly (P = 0.005) 1 year after treatment. The interdigitation zone did not improve in the absence of the ellipsoid zone band. Likewise, ellipsoid zone status did not improve in the absence of the external limiting membrane at any time after treatment.
The results of this study show that restoration of the interdigitation zone band constitutes a very sensitive marker of DME treatment outcome when the ellipsoid zone band is visible before treatment.
探讨指状交叉带、椭圆体带和外界膜的完整性是否为糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)治疗效果的可靠标志物。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了41只初治的DME患眼(38例患者),这些患眼接受了激光治疗、药物治疗和/或玻璃体切除术。在治疗前以及DME治疗后3个月、6个月和12个月评估最佳矫正视力以及指状交叉带、椭圆体带和外界膜的完整性。
治疗1年后,外界膜、椭圆体带和指状交叉带分别在30只眼(73.2%)、24只眼(58.5%)和2只眼(4.9%)中完全可见。治疗1年后指状交叉带状态显著改善(P = 0.005)。在没有椭圆体带的情况下,指状交叉带没有改善。同样,在治疗后的任何时候,在没有外界膜的情况下,椭圆体带状态也没有改善。
本研究结果表明,当治疗前椭圆体带可见时,指状交叉带的恢复是DME治疗效果的一个非常敏感的标志物。