Mdladla Khanyisile, Dzomba Edgar F, Muchadeyi Farai C
Agricultural Research Council, Biotechnology Platform, Private Bag X5, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa; Discipline of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
Discipline of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Mar 1;125:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
The present study investigated the seroprevalence of antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium and the associated risk factors in goats from five different farming provinces of South Africa. Sera collected from 686 goats of the commercial meat type (n=179), mohair type (n=9), non-descript indigenous goats from Eastern Cape (n=56), KwaZulu-Natal (n=209), Limpopo (n=111), North West (n=61) and Northern Cape (n=11) provinces and a feral Tankwa goat (n=50) were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to antigens of E. ruminantium using the indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFAT). Fifty two percent of these goats had ticks. The overall seroprevalence of antibodies to E. ruminantium was 64.87% (445/686) with the highest seroprevalence reported for Limpopo (95.50%) and lowest for Northern Cape (20.29%). Highest seroprevalence for antibodies to E. ruminantium was observed in goats from endemic regions (76.09%), and from smallholder production systems (89.54%). High seroprevalence was also observed in non-descript indigenous goats (85.04%), adult goat (69.62%), in does (67.46%) and goats infested with ticks (85.79%). The logistic model showed a gradient of increasing risk for commercial meat type Savanna (OR=3.681; CI=1.335-10.149) and non-descript indigenous (OR=3.466; CI=1.57-7.645) compared to Boer goats and for goats from the smallholder production system (OR=2.582; CI=1.182-5.639) and those with ticks (OR=3.587; CI=2.105-6.112). Results from this study showed that E. ruminantium infections were prevalent but were widely and unevenly distributed throughout South Africa. Findings from the study facilitate identification and mapping of risk areas for heartwater and its endeminicity in South Africa and should be taken into consideration for future disease control strategies and local goat improvement programs.
本研究调查了南非五个不同养殖省份山羊中反刍兽埃立克体抗体的血清流行率及相关危险因素。从商业肉用型山羊(n = 179)、马海毛型山羊(n = 9)、东开普省(n = 56)、夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省(n = 209)、林波波省(n = 111)、西北省(n = 61)和北开普省(n = 11)的非特定本土山羊以及一只野生坦夸山羊(n = 50)采集的血清,使用间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)检测针对反刍兽埃立克体抗原的免疫球蛋白G(IgG)抗体的存在情况。这些山羊中有52%感染了蜱。反刍兽埃立克体抗体的总体血清流行率为64.87%(445/686),其中林波波省报告的血清流行率最高(95.50%),北开普省最低(20.29%)。在来自流行地区的山羊(76.09%)和来自小农户生产系统的山羊(89.54%)中,观察到反刍兽埃立克体抗体的血清流行率最高。在非特定本土山羊(85.04%)、成年山羊(69.62%)、母羊(67.46%)以及感染蜱的山羊(85.79%)中也观察到高血清流行率。逻辑模型显示,与波尔山羊相比,商业肉用型热带草原山羊(优势比=3.681;可信区间=1.335 - 10.149)和非特定本土山羊(优势比=3.466;可信区间=
1.57 - 7.645)以及来自小农户生产系统的山羊(优势比=2.582;可信区间=1.182 - 5.639)和感染蜱的山羊(优势比=3.587;可信区间=2.105 - 6.112)的风险呈递增梯度。本研究结果表明,反刍兽埃立克体感染在南非普遍存在,但分布广泛且不均衡。该研究结果有助于识别和绘制南非心水病的风险区域及其地方性流行情况,在未来的疾病控制策略和当地山羊改良计划中应予以考虑。