Nawabi Danyal H, Degen Ryan M, Fields Kara G, McLawhorn Alexander, Ranawat Anil S, Sink Ernest L, Kelly Bryan T
Center for Hip Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Center for Hip Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1017-23. doi: 10.1177/0363546515624682. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
The outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of dysplasia are variable. Historically, arthroscopic treatment of severe dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] <18°) resulted in poor outcomes and iatrogenic instability. However, in milder forms of dysplasia, favorable outcomes have been reported.
To compare outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in borderline dysplastic (BD) patients compared with a control group of nondysplastic patients.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 METHODS: Between March 2009 and July 2012, a BD group (LCEA, 18°-25°) of 46 patients (55 hips) was identified. An age- and sex-matched control group of 131 patients (152 hips) was also identified (LCEA, 25°-40°). Patient-reported outcome scores, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), were collected preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
The mean LCEA was 22.4° ± 2.0° (range, 18.4°-24.9°) in the BD group and 31.0° ± 3.1° (range, 25.4°-38.7°) in the control group (P < .001). The mean preoperative alpha angle was 66.3° ± 9.9° in the BD group and 61.7° ± 13.0° in the control group (P = .151). Cam decompression was performed in 98.2% and 99.3% of cases in the BD and control groups, respectively; labral repair was performed in 69.1% and 75.3% of the BD and control groups, respectively, with 100% of patients having a complete capsular closure performed in both groups. At a mean follow-up of 31.3 ± 7.6 months (range, 23.1-67.3 months) in unrevised patients and 21.6 ± 13.3 months (range, 4.7-40.6 months) in revised patients, there was significant improvement (P < .001) in all patient-reported outcome scores in both groups. Multiple regression analysis did not identify any significant differences between groups. Importantly, female sex did not appear to be a predictor for inferior outcomes. Two patients (4.3%) in the BD group and 6 patients (4.6%) in the control group required revision arthroscopy during the study period.
Favorable outcomes can be expected after the treatment of impingement in patients with borderline dysplasia when labral refixation and capsular closure are performed, with comparable outcomes to nondysplastic patients. Further follow-up in larger cohorts is necessary to prove the durability and safety of hip arthroscopy in this challenging group and to further explore potential sex-related differences in outcome.
髋关节镜治疗发育异常的结果存在差异。从历史上看,关节镜治疗严重发育异常(外侧中心边缘角[LCEA]<18°)导致预后不良和医源性不稳定。然而,对于较轻形式的发育异常,已有良好预后的报道。
比较临界发育异常(BD)患者与非发育异常对照组患者在髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)后的预后。
队列研究;证据水平,3
在2009年3月至2012年7月期间,确定了46例患者(55髋)的BD组(LCEA,18°-25°)。还确定了131例患者(152髋)的年龄和性别匹配对照组(LCEA,25°-40°)。术前以及术后1年和2年收集患者报告的结局评分,包括改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)和特定运动子量表(HOS-SSS)以及国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-33)。
BD组的平均LCEA为22.4°±2.0°(范围,18.4°-24.9°),对照组为31.0°±3.1°(范围,25.4°-38.7°)(P<.001)。BD组术前平均α角为66.3°±9.9°,对照组为61.7°±13.0°(P = 0.151)。BD组和对照组分别有98.2%和99.3%的病例进行了凸轮减压;BD组和对照组分别有69.1%和75.3%的病例进行了盂唇修复,两组100%的患者均进行了完整的关节囊闭合。未翻修患者的平均随访时间为31.3±7.6个月(范围,23.1-67.3个月),翻修患者为21.6±13.3个月(范围,4.7-40.6个月),两组所有患者报告的结局评分均有显著改善(P<.001)。多元回归分析未发现两组之间有任何显著差异。重要的是,女性似乎不是预后较差的预测因素。在研究期间,BD组有2例患者(4.3%)和对照组有6例患者(4.6%)需要进行翻修关节镜检查。
对临界发育异常患者进行撞击治疗时,若进行盂唇重新固定和关节囊闭合,可预期获得良好预后,与非发育异常患者的预后相当。需要对更大队列进行进一步随访,以证明髋关节镜在这一具有挑战性的群体中的耐久性和安全性,并进一步探索结局中潜在的性别相关差异。