• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术后导管原位癌患者的预后评分及放疗对生存改善的影响:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。

Patient Prognostic Score and Associations With Survival Improvement Offered by Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

作者信息

Sagara Yasuaki, Freedman Rachel A, Vaz-Luis Ines, Mallory Melissa Anne, Wong Stephanie M, Aydogan Fatih, DeSantis Stephen, Barry William T, Golshan Mehra

机构信息

Yasuaki Sagara, Melissa Anne Mallory, Fatih Aydogan, and Mehra Golshan, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Yasuaki Sagara, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Rachel A. Freedman, Ines Vaz-Luis, Stephen DeSantis, and William T. Barry, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Stephanie M. Wong, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and Fatih Aydogan, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1190-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1869. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1869
PMID:26834064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4872326/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a standard treatment option for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to determine the survival benefit of RT after BCS on the basis of risk factors for local recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was performed to identify patients with DCIS diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 and treated with BCS by using SEER data. Patients were divided into the following two groups: BCS+RT (RT group) and BCS alone (non-RT group). We used a patient prognostic scoring model to stratify patients on the basis of risk of local recurrence. We performed a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score weighting to evaluate breast cancer mortality between the two groups.

RESULTS

We identified 32,144 eligible patients with DCIS, 20,329 (63%) in the RT group and 11,815 (37%) in the non-RT group. Overall, 304 breast cancer-specific deaths occurred over a median follow-up of 96 months, with a cumulative incidence of breast cancer mortality at 10 years in the weighted cohorts of 1.8% (RT group) and 2.1% (non-RT group; hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.88). Significant improvements in survival in the RT group compared with the non-RT group were only observed in patients with higher nuclear grade, younger age, and larger tumor size. The magnitude of the survival difference with RT was significantly correlated with prognostic score (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, the patient prognostic score for DCIS is associated with the magnitude of improvement in survival offered by RT after BCS, suggesting that decisions for RT could be tailored on the basis of patient factors, tumor biology, and the prognostic score.

摘要

目的

保乳手术(BCS)后放疗(RT)是导管原位癌(DCIS)治疗的标准选择。我们试图根据局部复发的危险因素来确定BCS后RT的生存获益。

患者与方法

进行一项回顾性纵向队列研究,利用监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据识别1988年至2007年间诊断为DCIS并接受BCS治疗的患者。患者被分为以下两组:BCS+RT(RT组)和单纯BCS(非RT组)。我们使用患者预后评分模型根据局部复发风险对患者进行分层。我们采用倾向评分加权的Cox比例风险模型来评估两组之间的乳腺癌死亡率。

结果

我们确定了32144例符合条件的DCIS患者,RT组20329例(63%),非RT组11815例(37%)。总体而言,在中位随访96个月期间发生了304例乳腺癌特异性死亡,加权队列中10年乳腺癌死亡率的累积发生率在RT组为1.8%,非RT组为2.1%(风险比,0.73;95%置信区间,0.62至0.88)。仅在核分级较高、年龄较小和肿瘤较大的患者中观察到RT组与非RT组相比生存有显著改善。RT导致的生存差异幅度与预后评分显著相关(P <.001)。

结论

在这项基于人群的研究中,DCIS患者的预后评分与BCS后RT所带来的生存改善幅度相关,这表明RT决策可根据患者因素、肿瘤生物学和预后评分进行调整。

相似文献

1
Patient Prognostic Score and Associations With Survival Improvement Offered by Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.保乳手术后导管原位癌患者的预后评分及放疗对生存改善的影响:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1190-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1869. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
Survival Benefit of Breast Surgery for Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Cohort Study.低级别导管原位癌行乳腺手术的生存获益:基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):739-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0876.
3
Long-term Survival Comparison of Repeated Breast-conserving Surgery Versus Mastectomy for Patients with DCIS with Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: A Real-world Longitudinal Study.保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的 DCIS 患者长期生存比较:一项真实世界的纵向研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug;21(4):360-372. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathologic Features in Patients With Breast Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ Who Received Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术治疗乳腺导管原位癌患者的临床病理特征的预后意义。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(6):441-450.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Multigene Expression Assay and Benefit of Radiotherapy After Breast Conservation in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.多基因表达分析与保乳术后放射治疗对导管原位癌的获益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Apr 1;109(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw256.
6
Omitting radiation therapy after lumpectomy for pure DCIS does not reduce the risk of salvage mastectomy.保乳术后省略放疗治疗单纯 DCIS 并不能降低挽救性乳房切除术的风险。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Invasive recurrence after breast conserving treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the Netherlands: time trends and the association with tumour grade.荷兰保乳治疗乳腺导管原位癌的侵袭性复发:时间趋势及与肿瘤分级的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(5):852-859. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02785-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Association of Radiotherapy With Survival in Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Lumpectomy or Mastectomy.保乳术或乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌的女性中放疗与生存的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1100.
9
Is higher dose radiation necessary for positive resection margin after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer?保乳手术后,更高的放射剂量对于获得切缘阳性是否必要?
Breast. 2019 Oct;47:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Patterns of care analysis among women with ductal carcinoma in situ in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州导管原位癌女性的护理模式分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning for predicting invasive recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ: leveraging histopathology images and clinical features.用于预测导管原位癌浸润性复发的深度学习:利用组织病理学图像和临床特征
EBioMedicine. 2025 Jun;116:105750. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105750. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Exploring the key genes associated with breast cancer radiotherapy sensitivity based on the stromal-immune score and analysis of the WGCNA and ceRNA network.基于基质-免疫评分以及加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)和竞争性内源RNA(ceRNA)网络,探索与乳腺癌放疗敏感性相关的关键基因。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34630. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34630. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
3
Case report: Bone marrow metastasis and bone marrow necrosis occurring 11 years after ductal carcinoma of the breast.病例报告:乳腺癌导管癌发生11年后出现骨髓转移和骨髓坏死。
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 23;14:1473896. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1473896. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of surgical types on overall survival in patients with ductal carcinoma : an analysis based on the SEER database.手术类型对导管癌患者总生存期的影响:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析
Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):910-926. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-468. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS.指导放射肿瘤学家管理导管原位癌的工具。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 6;12(7):795. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070795.
6
How much do we know about the metastatic process?我们对转移过程了解多少?
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2024 Aug;41(4):275-299. doi: 10.1007/s10585-023-10248-0. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Changing trends in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in Republic of Korea: a comprehensive analysis using Health Insurance Review and Assessment data [2009-2020].韩国导管原位癌管理的变化趋势:基于健康保险审查与评估数据[2009 - 2020]的综合分析
Gland Surg. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):131-143. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-433. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
Clinicopathological differences and survival benefit in ER+/PR+/HER2+ vs ER+/PR-/HER2+ breast cancer subtypes.ER+/PR+/HER2+ 与 ER+/PR-/HER2+ 乳腺癌亚型的临床病理差异和生存获益。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Mar;31(2):295-304. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01538-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
The prognostic value of the histological shape of tumor negative sentinel nodes in breast cancer.肿瘤阴性前哨淋巴结组织学形态的预后价值在乳腺癌中的体现。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1258641. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1258641. eCollection 2023.
10
Survival outcomes of low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma at different risk levels: a corollary for active surveillance.不同风险水平的低危型甲状腺乳头状癌的生存结局:主动监测的推论。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 7;14:1235006. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1235006. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Excision Without Radiation for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: 12-Year Results From the ECOG-ACRIN E5194 Study.不进行放疗的手术切除治疗乳腺导管原位癌:ECOG-ACRIN E5194研究的12年结果
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3938-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8588. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
2
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌诊断后的乳腺癌死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510.
3
Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties.美国各县的乳腺癌筛查、发病率和死亡率
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1483-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3043.
4
A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone.一项基于人群的验证性研究,评估DCIS评分对仅接受保乳手术治疗的个体复发风险的预测作用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Survival Benefit of Breast Surgery for Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Cohort Study.低级别导管原位癌行乳腺手术的生存获益:基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):739-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0876.
6
RTOG 9804: a prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation.放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)9804:一项针对低风险导管原位癌的前瞻性随机试验,比较放疗与观察的效果。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):709-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9029. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.解决癌症的过度诊断和过度治疗问题:变革的良方。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):e234-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70598-9.
9
Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)治疗数据与医疗保险理赔数据的比较
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):e55-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000073.
10
Eight-year update of a prospective study of wide excision alone for small low- or intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).一项单独广泛切除术治疗小低或中级别导管原位癌(DCIS)的前瞻性研究 8 年随访结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jan;143(2):343-50. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2813-6. Epub 2013 Dec 18.