1 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
2 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):475-80. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-006OC.
RATIONALE: Many pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows are interested in improving their teaching skills as well as learning about careers as clinician educators. Educational opportunities in PCCM fellowship programs designed to address these interests have not been well characterized in U.S. training programs. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize educational content and structure for training fellows to teach in PCCM fellowship programs. We evaluated three major domains: (1) existing educational opportunities, (2) PCCM program directors' attitudes toward the importance of teaching fellows how to teach, and (3) potential components of an optimal teaching skills curriculum for PCCM fellows. METHODS: We surveyed program and associate program directors who were members of the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors in 2014. Survey domains included existing teaching skills content and structure, presence of a formal medical education curriculum or clinician educator track, perceived barriers to teaching fellows teaching skills, and open-ended qualitative inquiries about the ideal curricula. Data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 158 invited Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors members, 85 program directors and associate directors responded (53.8% response rate). Annual curricular time dedicated to teaching skills varied widely (median, 3 h; mean, 5.4 h; interquartile range, 2.0-6.3 h), with 17 respondents (20%) allotting no time to teaching fellows to teach and 14 respondents (17%) dedicating more than 10 hours. Survey participants stated that the optimal duration for training fellows in teaching skills was significantly less than what they reported was actually occurring (median optimal duration, 1.5 h/yr; mean, 2.1 h/yr; interquartile range, 1.5-3.5 h/yr; P < 0.001). Only 28 (33.7%) had a formal curriculum for teaching medical education skills. Qualitative analyses identified several barriers to implementing formal teaching skills curricula, including "time," "financial resources," "competing priorities," and "lack of expert faculty." CONCLUSIONS: While prior work has demonstrated that fellows are interested in obtaining medical education skills, PCCM program directors and associate directors noted significant challenges to implementing formal educational opportunities to teach fellows these skills. Effective strategies are needed to design, implement, sustain, and assess teaching skills curricula for PCCM fellowships.
背景:许多呼吸与危重症医学(PCCM)专业的住院医师都对提高教学技能以及了解临床教育者的职业发展感兴趣。然而,在美国培训计划中,尚未很好地描述专门针对这些兴趣的 PCCM 住院医师培训计划中的教育机会。
目的:我们旨在描述培训住院医师在 PCCM 住院医师培训计划中进行教学的教育内容和结构。我们评估了三个主要领域:(1)现有的教育机会;(2)PCCM 项目主任对教授住院医师教学技能重要性的态度;以及(3)PCCM 住院医师最佳教学技能课程的潜在组成部分。
方法:我们于 2014 年对呼吸与危重症医学项目主任协会的项目主任和副主任进行了调查。调查领域包括现有的教学技能内容和结构、是否存在正式的医学教育课程或临床教育者轨道、教授住院医师教学技能的感知障碍,以及对理想课程的开放式定性查询。数据进行了定量和定性分析。
测量和主要结果:在 158 名受邀的呼吸与危重症医学项目主任协会成员中,有 85 名项目主任和副主任做出了回应(53.8%的回应率)。每年用于教学技能的课程时间差异很大(中位数为 3 小时;平均值为 5.4 小时;四分位间距为 2.0-6.3 小时),17 名应答者(20%)没有为住院医师教授教学分配时间,14 名应答者(17%)分配了 10 多个小时。调查参与者表示,培训住院医师教学技能的最佳时间明显短于他们实际报告的时间(中位数最佳时间为 1.5 小时/年;平均值为 2.1 小时/年;四分位间距为 1.5-3.5 小时/年;P<0.001)。只有 28 名(33.7%)有正式的医学教育技能教学课程。定性分析确定了实施正式教学技能课程的几个障碍,包括“时间”、“财务资源”、“竞争优先级”和“缺乏专家教师”。
结论:尽管之前的工作已经表明住院医师有兴趣获得医学教育技能,但 PCCM 项目主任和副主任指出,在实施正式的教育机会以教授住院医师这些技能方面存在重大挑战。需要制定有效的策略来设计、实施、维持和评估 PCCM 住院医师奖学金的教学技能课程。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019-12-12
J Palliat Med. 2005-10
ATS Sch. 2024-2-2
Med Sci Educ. 2020-6-10
Crit Care Explor. 2020-10-19
Clin Rheumatol. 2019-12-12
BMC Med Educ. 2018-9-24