Suppr超能文献

竞技游泳训练的生理适应性:一项系统综述。

Physiological Adaptations to Training in Competitive Swimming: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Costa Mário J, Balasekaran Govindasamy, Vilas-Boas J Paulo, Barbosa Tiago M

机构信息

Sports Science Department, Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, Portugal; Research Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, CIDESD, Portugal.

National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2015 Dec 30;49:179-94. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0120. eCollection 2015 Dec 22.

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize longitudinal studies on swimming physiology and get implications for daily practice. A computerized search of databases according to the PRISMA statement was employed. Studies were screened for eligibility on inclusion criteria: (i) present two testing points; (ii) on swimming physiology; (iii) using adult elite swimmers; (iv) no case-studies or with small sample sizes. Two independent reviewers used a checklist to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Thirty-four studies selected for analysis were gathered into five main categories: blood composition (n=7), endocrine secretion (n=11), muscle biochemistry (n=7), cardiovascular response (n=8) and the energetic profile (n=14). The mean quality index was 10.58 ± 2.19 points demonstrating an almost perfect agreement between reviewers (K = 0.93). It can be concluded that the mixed findings in the literature are due to the diversity of the experimental designs. Micro variables obtained at the cellular or molecular level are sensitive measures and demonstrate overtraining signs and health symptoms. The improvement of macro variables (i.e. main physiological systems) is limited and may depend on the athletes' training background and experience.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是总结关于游泳生理学的纵向研究,并得出对日常实践的启示。根据PRISMA声明对数据库进行了计算机化检索。根据纳入标准筛选研究的合格性:(i)呈现两个测试点;(ii)关于游泳生理学;(iii)使用成年精英游泳运动员;(iv)非案例研究或样本量小的研究。两名独立评审员使用清单评估研究的方法学质量。选择进行分析的34项研究分为五个主要类别:血液成分(n = 7)、内分泌分泌(n = 11)、肌肉生物化学(n = 7)、心血管反应(n = 8)和能量状况(n = 14)。平均质量指数为10.58±2.19分,表明评审员之间几乎完全一致(K = 0.93)。可以得出结论,文献中的混合结果是由于实验设计的多样性。在细胞或分子水平获得的微观变量是敏感指标,可显示过度训练的迹象和健康症状。宏观变量(即主要生理系统)的改善是有限的,可能取决于运动员的训练背景和经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/4723167/ff2193a739ec/jhk-49-179f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验